PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEFAX vs. FMDGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MEFAX vs. FMDGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MassMutual Mid Cap Growth Fund (MEFAX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEFAX achieves a 4.72% return, which is significantly higher than FMDGX's 3.82% return.


MEFAX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.46%
YTD
4.72%
6M
3.27%
1Y
9.16%
3Y*
9.36%
5Y*
2.43%
10Y*
10.68%

FMDGX

1D
-0.11%
1M
1.82%
YTD
3.82%
6M
1.82%
1Y
5.26%
3Y*
15.69%
5Y*
5.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEFAX vs. FMDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MEFAX
MassMutual Mid Cap Growth Fund
4.72%3.19%10.80%19.11%-24.58%13.75%25.52%11.93%
FMDGX
Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund
3.82%8.60%22.03%25.79%-26.67%12.67%34.84%4.63%

Correlation

The correlation between MEFAX and FMDGX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019

0.95

The correlation between MEFAX and FMDGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MEFAX vs. FMDGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEFAX
MEFAX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
MEFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
MEFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

FMDGX
FMDGX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FMDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
FMDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEFAX vs. FMDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MassMutual Mid Cap Growth Fund (MEFAX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MEFAXFMDGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.07

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

0.42

+0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.50

1.20

+2.30

MEFAX vs. FMDGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEFAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is higher than the FMDGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEFAX and FMDGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MEFAX vs. FMDGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEFAX drawdown since its inception was -56.04%, which is greater than FMDGX's maximum drawdown of -38.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEFAX and FMDGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MEFAXFMDGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.04%

-38.59%

-17.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.45%

-14.75%

+4.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.46%

-25.30%

-9.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.14%

-38.59%

-6.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.69%

-2.08%

-12.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.43%

-11.14%

-0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

5.09%

-2.22%

Volatility

MEFAX vs. FMDGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MassMutual Mid Cap Growth Fund (MEFAX) is 5.22%, while Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX) has a volatility of 5.70%. This indicates that MEFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMDGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MEFAXFMDGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.22%

5.70%

-0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.96%

13.38%

-1.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.15%

17.07%

-1.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.52%

22.45%

+5.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.97%

24.30%

-0.33%

MEFAX vs. FMDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEFAX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FMDGX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

MEFAX vs. FMDGX - Dividend Comparison

MEFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 32.62%, more than FMDGX's 1.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMDGX
Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund
1.79%1.85%0.47%0.63%0.81%6.43%0.36%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MEFAX
MassMutual Mid Cap Growth Fund
32.62%34.16%21.40%7.62%20.71%29.49%6.92%12.81%12.06%7.66%5.32%10.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, MEFAX and FMDGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FMDGX has higher volatility (5.70%) compared to MEFAX (5.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEFAX dropped -56.04% vs FMDGX's -38.59%.

MEFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.67 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MEFAX and FMDGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer