PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEFAX vs. BFGFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MEFAX vs. BFGFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MassMutual Mid Cap Growth Fund (MEFAX) and Baron Focused Growth Fund (BFGFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEFAX achieves a 5.32% return, which is significantly higher than BFGFX's 1.84% return. Over the past 10 years, MEFAX has underperformed BFGFX with an annualized return of 10.32%, while BFGFX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.90% annualized return.


MEFAX

1D
0.19%
1M
2.74%
YTD
5.32%
6M
5.34%
1Y
12.16%
3Y*
9.99%
5Y*
3.13%
10Y*
10.32%

BFGFX

1D
-1.89%
1M
6.00%
YTD
1.84%
6M
12.90%
1Y
21.99%
3Y*
20.72%
5Y*
12.80%
10Y*
20.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEFAX vs. BFGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MEFAX
MassMutual Mid Cap Growth Fund
5.32%3.19%10.80%19.11%-24.58%13.75%25.52%40.75%-3.88%24.12%
BFGFX
Baron Focused Growth Fund
1.84%21.94%29.52%27.40%-28.21%18.67%122.38%30.05%3.76%26.36%

Correlation

The correlation between MEFAX and BFGFX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2004

0.76

The correlation between MEFAX and BFGFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MEFAX vs. BFGFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEFAX
MEFAX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
MEFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
MEFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

BFGFX
BFGFX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
BFGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BFGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
BFGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
BFGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
BFGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEFAX vs. BFGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MassMutual Mid Cap Growth Fund (MEFAX) and Baron Focused Growth Fund (BFGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MEFAXBFGFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.86

1.19

-0.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.33

2.18

-0.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.25

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

2.32

-1.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.45

6.26

-1.80

MEFAX vs. BFGFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEFAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is comparable to the BFGFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEFAX and BFGFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MEFAXBFGFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

1.19

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.58

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.87

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.70

-0.31

Drawdowns

MEFAX vs. BFGFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEFAX drawdown since its inception was -56.04%, smaller than the maximum BFGFX drawdown of -59.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEFAX and BFGFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MEFAXBFGFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.04%

-59.52%

+3.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.45%

-9.74%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.46%

-21.00%

-13.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.14%

-35.93%

-9.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.14%

-43.62%

-1.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.19%

-1.89%

-12.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.43%

-12.37%

+0.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

3.61%

-0.76%

Volatility

MEFAX vs. BFGFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MassMutual Mid Cap Growth Fund (MEFAX) is 3.87%, while Baron Focused Growth Fund (BFGFX) has a volatility of 5.18%. This indicates that MEFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BFGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MEFAXBFGFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.87%

5.18%

-1.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.27%

15.67%

-4.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.66%

19.05%

-4.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.46%

22.34%

+5.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.94%

23.99%

-0.05%

MEFAX vs. BFGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEFAX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BFGFX's 1.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

MEFAX vs. BFGFX - Dividend Comparison

MEFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 32.43%, while BFGFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BFGFX
Baron Focused Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%12.28%15.53%2.85%1.78%1.07%2.11%6.02%5.80%
MEFAX
MassMutual Mid Cap Growth Fund
32.43%34.16%21.40%7.62%20.71%29.49%6.92%12.81%12.06%7.66%5.32%10.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


MEFAX and BFGFX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BFGFX has higher volatility (5.18%) compared to MEFAX (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEFAX dropped -56.04% vs BFGFX's -59.52%.

BFGFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MEFAX and BFGFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer