PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEDIX vs. DLENX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MEDIX vs. DLENX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Emerging Markets Debt Fund (MEDIX) and DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N (DLENX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEDIX achieves a 2.30% return, which is significantly higher than DLENX's 1.16% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MEDIX having a 3.71% annualized return and DLENX not far behind at 3.61%.


MEDIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.61%
YTD
2.30%
6M
3.25%
1Y
12.51%
3Y*
9.42%
5Y*
2.07%
10Y*
3.71%

DLENX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.12%
YTD
1.16%
6M
1.61%
1Y
6.35%
3Y*
8.01%
5Y*
1.86%
10Y*
3.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEDIX vs. DLENX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MEDIX
MFS Emerging Markets Debt Fund
2.30%12.48%5.92%9.42%-15.97%-2.40%8.01%14.12%-4.99%9.64%
DLENX
DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N
1.16%8.11%7.92%9.36%-15.50%1.71%4.66%11.71%-3.54%8.31%

Correlation

The correlation between MEDIX and DLENX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2010

0.70

The correlation between MEDIX and DLENX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MEDIX vs. DLENX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEDIX
MEDIX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
MEDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
MEDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

DLENX
DLENX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
DLENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLENX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
DLENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLENX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEDIX vs. DLENX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Emerging Markets Debt Fund (MEDIX) and DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N (DLENX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MEDIXDLENXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.18

3.26

-0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.29

4.86

+0.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

1.76

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

3.45

-0.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.81

13.77

+0.04

MEDIX vs. DLENX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEDIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.18, which is comparable to the DLENX Sharpe Ratio of 3.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEDIX and DLENX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MEDIXDLENXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.18

3.26

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.41

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.78

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.97

0.95

+0.03

Drawdowns

MEDIX vs. DLENX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEDIX drawdown since its inception was -35.31%, which is greater than DLENX's maximum drawdown of -25.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEDIX and DLENX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MEDIXDLENXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.31%

-25.64%

-9.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.12%

-1.83%

-2.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.48%

-4.58%

-2.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.40%

-25.64%

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.40%

-25.64%

-1.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.44%

-3.61%

-0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

0.46%

+0.48%

Volatility

MEDIX vs. DLENX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Emerging Markets Debt Fund (MEDIX) has a higher volatility of 1.40% compared to DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N (DLENX) at 0.68%. This indicates that MEDIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLENX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MEDIXDLENXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.40%

0.68%

+0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.26%

1.43%

+1.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.93%

1.93%

+2.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.89%

4.55%

+1.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.87%

4.66%

+1.21%

MEDIX vs. DLENX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEDIX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is lower than DLENX's 1.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

MEDIX vs. DLENX - Dividend Comparison

MEDIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, less than DLENX's 5.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DLENX
DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N
5.32%5.33%5.71%5.29%4.49%3.74%4.11%4.49%3.57%4.07%4.29%4.94%
MEDIX
MFS Emerging Markets Debt Fund
5.05%5.22%5.68%4.90%5.51%4.33%4.07%4.59%4.87%4.46%4.86%5.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


MEDIX and DLENX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MEDIX has higher volatility (1.40%) compared to DLENX (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEDIX dropped -35.31% vs DLENX's -25.64%.

DLENX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 3.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MEDIX and DLENX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer