PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEDIX vs. TEDNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MEDIX vs. TEDNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Emerging Markets Debt Fund (MEDIX) and TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Debt Fund (TEDNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEDIX achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly higher than TEDNX's 0.72% return. Over the past 10 years, MEDIX has underperformed TEDNX with an annualized return of 3.17%, while TEDNX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.51% annualized return.


MEDIX

1D
-0.16%
1M
-1.49%
6M
0.40%
YTD
1.41%
1Y
7.73%
3Y*
7.77%
5Y*
1.76%
10Y*
3.17%
ALL TIME*
7.37%

TEDNX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.77%
6M
-0.15%
YTD
0.72%
1Y
7.00%
3Y*
9.36%
5Y*
3.31%
10Y*
4.51%
ALL TIME*
4.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MEDIX vs. TEDNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MEDIX
MFS Emerging Markets Debt Fund
1.41%12.48%5.92%9.42%-15.97%-2.40%8.01%14.12%-4.99%9.64%
TEDNX
TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Debt Fund
0.72%13.84%8.61%12.56%-14.41%-0.86%6.13%17.49%-5.95%12.07%

Correlation

The correlation between MEDIX and TEDNX is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.87

The correlation between MEDIX and TEDNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MEDIX vs. TEDNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MEDIX
MEDIX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
MEDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
MEDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

TEDNX
TEDNX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
TEDNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEDNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEDNX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
TEDNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEDNX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MEDIX vs. TEDNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Emerging Markets Debt Fund (MEDIX) and TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Debt Fund (TEDNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MEDIXTEDNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.40

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

1.36

+0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.69

5.22

+3.47

MEDIX vs. TEDNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEDIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the TEDNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEDIX and TEDNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MEDIX vs. TEDNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEDIX drawdown since its inception was -35.31%, which is greater than TEDNX's maximum drawdown of -25.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEDIX and TEDNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MEDIXTEDNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.31%

-25.65%

-9.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.12%

-5.36%

+1.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.44%

-5.36%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.40%

-25.65%

-1.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.40%

-25.65%

-1.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.57%

-1.44%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.42%

-4.61%

+0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

1.39%

-0.42%

Volatility

MEDIX vs. TEDNX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Emerging Markets Debt Fund (MEDIX) and TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Debt Fund (TEDNX) have volatilities of 0.81% and 0.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MEDIXTEDNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.81%

0.84%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.29%

3.73%

-0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.99%

4.15%

-0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.91%

5.45%

+0.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.85%

6.04%

-0.19%

MEDIX vs. TEDNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEDIX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than TEDNX's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

MEDIX vs. TEDNX - Dividend Comparison

MEDIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, more than TEDNX's 4.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MEDIX
MFS Emerging Markets Debt Fund
5.05%5.22%5.68%4.90%5.51%4.33%4.07%4.59%4.87%4.46%4.86%5.25%
TEDNX
TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Debt Fund
4.91%5.80%6.58%5.03%6.15%4.81%4.27%5.28%5.58%5.93%5.56%5.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


MEDIX and TEDNX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TEDNX has higher volatility (0.84%) compared to MEDIX (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEDIX dropped -35.31% vs TEDNX's -25.65%.

MEDIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MEDIX and TEDNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer