MEDI vs. UNHW

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

MEDI (Harbor Health Care ETF) and UNHW (Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MEDI is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by Harbor, while UNHW is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill Investments. Both are actively managed. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MEDI charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for UNHW.

Performance

MEDI vs. UNHW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Health Care ETF (MEDI) and Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEDI achieves a 6.14% return, which is significantly lower than UNHW's 32.80% return.

MEDI

• 1D: -1.20%
• 1M: 7.55%
• 6M: 4.51%
• YTD: 6.14%
• 1Y: 22.82%
• 3Y*: 15.41%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UNHW

• 1D: -1.13%
• 1M: 5.22%
• 6M: 31.52%
• YTD: 32.80%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEDI vs. UNHW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MEDI Harbor Health Care ETF	6.14%	-0.17%
UNHW Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF	32.80%	1.54%

Correlation

The correlation between MEDI and UNHW is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025	0.24

MEDI vs. UNHW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MEDI	UNHW
Healthcare	100.0%	27.9%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

MEDI vs. UNHW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEDI

MEDI Risk / Return Rank: 37
MEDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
MEDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
MEDI Omega Ratio Rank: 35
MEDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
MEDI Martin Ratio Rank: 35

UNHW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEDI vs. UNHW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Health Care ETF (MEDI) and Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MEDI	UNHW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.13	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.73	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.49	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.35	—	—

Drawdowns

MEDI vs. UNHW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEDI drawdown since its inception was -19.24%, smaller than the maximum UNHW drawdown of -32.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEDI and UNHW.

Drawdown Indicators

	MEDI	UNHW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.24%	-32.28%	+13.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.34%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.30%	-1.66%	-2.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.25%	-10.39%	+6.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.26%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MEDI	UNHW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.66%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.75%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.38%	47.35%	-26.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.74%	47.35%	-28.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.74%	47.35%	-28.61%

MEDI vs. UNHW - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEDI has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than UNHW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

MEDI vs. UNHW - Dividend Comparison

MEDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than UNHW's 19.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
MEDI Harbor Health Care ETF	0.26%	0.28%	0.54%	1.86%
UNHW Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF	19.69%	2.81%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MEDI and UNHW in my portfolio?

MEDI and UNHW have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MEDI or UNHW?

On fees, MEDI is cheaper at 0.80% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MEDI or UNHW?

MEDI is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for UNHW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MEDI or UNHW?

UNHW has the higher dividend yield at 19.69%, compared with 0.26% for MEDI.

What is the main difference between MEDI and UNHW?

MEDI is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while UNHW is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for MEDI and 0.99% for UNHW.