MEDI vs. GSKH

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MEDI (Harbor Health Care ETF) and GSKH (GSK plc ADRhedged ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. MEDI is actively managed, while GSKH is passively managed. Over the past year, MEDI returned 20.72% vs 42.66% for GSKH. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MEDI charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for GSKH.

Performance

MEDI vs. GSKH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Health Care ETF (MEDI) and GSK plc ADRhedged ETF (GSKH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEDI achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly lower than GSKH's 9.90% return.

MEDI

• 1D: 1.41%
• 1M: 1.66%
• YTD: 0.41%
• 6M: -0.41%
• 1Y: 20.72%
• 3Y*: 13.92%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GSKH

• 1D: 2.87%
• 1M: 2.94%
• YTD: 9.90%
• 6M: 10.56%
• 1Y: 42.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEDI vs. GSKH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MEDI Harbor Health Care ETF	0.41%	24.12%
GSKH GSK plc ADRhedged ETF	9.90%	36.51%

Correlation

The correlation between MEDI and GSKH is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2025	0.39

Return for Risk

MEDI vs. GSKH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEDI

MEDI Risk / Return Rank: 30
MEDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
MEDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
MEDI Omega Ratio Rank: 28
MEDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
MEDI Martin Ratio Rank: 29

GSKH

GSKH Risk / Return Rank: 51
GSKH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
GSKH Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
GSKH Omega Ratio Rank: 54
GSKH Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
GSKH Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEDI vs. GSKH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Health Care ETF (MEDI) and GSK plc ADRhedged ETF (GSKH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MEDI	GSKH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.03	1.64	-0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.61	2.43	-0.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.30	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.36	2.31	-0.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.96	6.06	-2.10

MEDI vs. GSKH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEDI Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the GSKH Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEDI and GSKH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MEDI vs. GSKH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEDI drawdown since its inception was -19.24%, roughly equal to the maximum GSKH drawdown of -18.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEDI and GSKH.

Drawdown Indicators

	MEDI	GSKH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.24%	-18.54%	-0.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.34%	-18.54%	+3.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.76%	-11.62%	+7.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.30%	-5.86%	+1.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.25%	7.06%	-1.81%

Volatility

MEDI vs. GSKH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harbor Health Care ETF (MEDI) is 6.32%, while GSK plc ADRhedged ETF (GSKH) has a volatility of 6.89%. This indicates that MEDI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSKH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MEDI	GSKH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.32%	6.89%	-0.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.71%	18.67%	-2.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.22%	26.14%	-5.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.68%	26.95%	-8.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.68%	26.95%	-8.27%

MEDI vs. GSKH - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEDI has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than GSKH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

MEDI vs. GSKH - Dividend Comparison

MEDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than GSKH's 2.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
GSKH GSK plc ADRhedged ETF	2.82%	1.15%	0.00%	0.00%
MEDI Harbor Health Care ETF	0.28%	0.28%	0.54%	1.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MEDI and GSKH in my portfolio?

MEDI and GSKH have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MEDI or GSKH?

GSKH has higher volatility (6.89%) compared to MEDI (6.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEDI dropped -19.24% vs GSKH's -18.54%.

Which ETF is better, MEDI or GSKH?

On 1-year performance, GSKH leads with 42.66% vs 20.72% for MEDI. On fees, GSKH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, MEDI has been the lower-risk option at 6.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MEDI or GSKH?

Over the 1-year period, GSKH has performed better with a 42.66% return vs 20.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MEDI or GSKH?

GSKH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for MEDI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MEDI or GSKH?

GSKH has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 0.28% for MEDI.

What is the main difference between MEDI and GSKH?

They also come from different issuers: Harbor and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for MEDI and 0.19% for GSKH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSKH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.