MED vs. FF
MED (Medifast, Inc.) and FF (FutureFuel Corp.) are both stocks. MED operates in Personal Services (Consumer Cyclical), while FF operates in Chemicals (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, MED returned -7.29%/yr vs 3.98%/yr for FF. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MED vs. FF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MED achieves a 11.33% return, which is significantly lower than FF's 46.58% return. Over the past 10 years, MED has underperformed FF with an annualized return of -7.29%, while FF has yielded a comparatively higher 3.98% annualized return.
MED
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -4.73%
- YTD
- 11.33%
- 6M
- -3.80%
- 1Y
- -8.40%
- 3Y*
- -46.74%
- 5Y*
- -45.89%
- 10Y*
- -7.29%
FF
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 14.41%
- YTD
- 46.58%
- 6M
- 38.76%
- 1Y
- 16.71%
- 3Y*
- -6.25%
- 5Y*
- -4.53%
- 10Y*
- 3.98%
MED vs. FF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MED Medifast, Inc. | 11.33% | -39.39% | -73.79% | -38.34% | -42.31% | 9.36% | 86.18% | -9.73% | 82.11% | 72.33% |
FF FutureFuel Corp. | 46.58% | -35.84% | 31.03% | -22.78% | 9.85% | -26.86% | 37.61% | -20.32% | 14.46% | 3.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between MED and FF is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2011 | 0.28 |
The correlation between MED and FF shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MED:
$130.86M
FF:
$202.52M
MED:
-$1.82
FF:
-$1.19
MED:
0.38
FF:
1.83
MED:
0.66
FF:
1.43
MED:
$346.10M
FF:
$110.11M
MED:
$242.70M
FF:
-$26.13M
MED:
-$3.86M
FF:
-$50.17M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MED vs. FF — Risk / Return Rank
MED
FF
MED vs. FF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Medifast, Inc. (MED) and FutureFuel Corp. (FF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MED | FF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.14 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.26 | 0.81 | -1.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.44 | 1.67 | -2.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MED vs. FF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MED drawdown since its inception was -98.40%, which is greater than FF's maximum drawdown of -64.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MED and FF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MED | FF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.40% | -64.23% | -34.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.39% | -30.85% | -6.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -90.91% | -51.46% | -39.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.29% | -51.46% | -44.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.76% | -64.23% | -32.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.96% | -45.08% | -50.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.84% | -30.54% | -20.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.83% | 14.89% | +6.94% |
Volatility
MED vs. FF - Volatility Comparison
Medifast, Inc. (MED) and FutureFuel Corp. (FF) have volatilities of 8.94% and 9.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MED | FF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.94% | 9.35% | -0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.69% | 39.19% | -7.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.90% | 49.93% | -8.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.25% | 46.27% | -1.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.68% | 44.61% | +3.07% |
Dividends
MED vs. FF - Dividend Comparison
MED has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FF FutureFuel Corp. | 4.13% | 7.52% | 51.80% | 3.95% | 2.95% | 35.86% | 25.51% | 1.94% | 1.51% | 1.70% | 18.20% | 1.78% |
MED Medifast, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.36% | 5.69% | 2.71% | 2.30% | 3.08% | 1.75% | 2.06% | 2.57% | 0.82% |
Financials
MED vs. FF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Medifast, Inc. and FutureFuel Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MED vs. FF - Profitability Comparison
MED - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Medifast, Inc. reported a gross profit of 51.76M and revenue of 76.04M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.1%.
FF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FutureFuel Corp. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 31.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
MED - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Medifast, Inc. reported an operating income of -3.30M and revenue of 76.04M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.3%.
FF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FutureFuel Corp. reported an operating income of -20.84M and revenue of 31.90M, resulting in an operating margin of -65.3%.
MED - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Medifast, Inc. reported a net income of -2.12M and revenue of 76.04M, resulting in a net margin of -2.8%.
FF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FutureFuel Corp. reported a net income of -20.58M and revenue of 31.90M, resulting in a net margin of -64.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MED and FF have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FF has higher volatility (9.35%) compared to MED (8.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MED dropped -98.40% vs FF's -64.23%.
FF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.50 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MED and FF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer