PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MECVX vs. CIGEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MECVX vs. CIGEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MainStay Epoch Capital Growth Fund (MECVX) and Calamos Global Equity Fund (CIGEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MECVX achieves a 7.62% return, which is significantly lower than CIGEX's 22.14% return.


MECVX

1D
0.06%
1M
1.91%
YTD
7.62%
6M
6.31%
1Y
18.49%
3Y*
14.89%
5Y*
9.26%
10Y*

CIGEX

1D
0.41%
1M
2.47%
YTD
22.14%
6M
20.59%
1Y
35.48%
3Y*
27.36%
5Y*
12.67%
10Y*
16.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MECVX vs. CIGEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MECVX
MainStay Epoch Capital Growth Fund
7.62%13.10%10.52%29.35%-19.63%25.00%29.21%34.56%-8.92%26.65%
CIGEX
Calamos Global Equity Fund
22.14%18.46%30.61%24.55%-27.42%16.61%44.24%29.43%-15.54%34.56%

Correlation

The correlation between MECVX and CIGEX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2016

0.89

The correlation between MECVX and CIGEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MECVX vs. CIGEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MECVX
MECVX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
MECVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MECVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
MECVX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
MECVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
MECVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

CIGEX
CIGEX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
CIGEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIGEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIGEX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
CIGEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIGEX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MECVX vs. CIGEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay Epoch Capital Growth Fund (MECVX) and Calamos Global Equity Fund (CIGEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MECVXCIGEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.32

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

2.77

-0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.61

10.33

-2.72

MECVX vs. CIGEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MECVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the CIGEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MECVX and CIGEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MECVX vs. CIGEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MECVX drawdown since its inception was -30.36%, smaller than the maximum CIGEX drawdown of -60.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MECVX and CIGEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MECVXCIGEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.36%

-60.48%

+30.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.06%

-13.31%

+3.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.57%

-20.41%

+3.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.51%

-35.81%

+6.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-0.45%

-0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.91%

-10.32%

+5.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

3.56%

-1.02%

Volatility

MECVX vs. CIGEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MainStay Epoch Capital Growth Fund (MECVX) is 4.64%, while Calamos Global Equity Fund (CIGEX) has a volatility of 7.90%. This indicates that MECVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIGEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MECVXCIGEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.64%

7.90%

-3.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.44%

16.85%

-6.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.02%

20.34%

-7.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.52%

19.67%

-3.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.84%

19.56%

-2.72%

MECVX vs. CIGEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MECVX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is higher than CIGEX's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

MECVX vs. CIGEX - Dividend Comparison

MECVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.54%, less than CIGEX's 12.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIGEX
Calamos Global Equity Fund
12.58%15.37%8.67%0.10%4.43%11.75%6.51%7.44%27.66%9.21%4.62%1.98%
MECVX
MainStay Epoch Capital Growth Fund
7.54%8.12%4.30%0.32%1.01%28.36%19.49%9.87%7.96%3.31%0.22%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MECVX and CIGEX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIGEX has higher volatility (7.90%) compared to MECVX (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MECVX dropped -30.36% vs CIGEX's -60.48%.

CIGEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MECVX and CIGEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer