MDYV vs. TPHD
MDYV (SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF) and TPHD (Timothy Plan High Dividend Stock ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - MDYV tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Value Index while TPHD tracks the Victory US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Weighted BRI Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MDYV returned 7.48%/yr vs 8.52%/yr for TPHD. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MDYV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for TPHD.
Performance
MDYV vs. TPHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDYV achieves a 9.04% return, which is significantly higher than TPHD's 8.56% return.
MDYV
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- YTD
- 9.04%
- 6M
- 9.24%
- 1Y
- 20.68%
- 3Y*
- 13.90%
- 5Y*
- 7.48%
- 10Y*
- 10.40%
TPHD
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- YTD
- 8.56%
- 6M
- 7.69%
- 1Y
- 13.23%
- 3Y*
- 13.21%
- 5Y*
- 8.52%
- 10Y*
- —
MDYV vs. TPHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDYV SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF | 9.04% | 7.45% | 11.48% | 15.35% | -7.19% | 30.51% | 3.68% | 6.68% |
TPHD Timothy Plan High Dividend Stock ETF | 8.56% | 8.28% | 12.14% | 8.86% | -1.91% | 27.98% | -1.30% | 10.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDYV and TPHD is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2019 | 0.88 |
The correlation between MDYV and TPHD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
MDYV vs. TPHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MDYV
TPHD
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Technology
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Healthcare
Communication Services
Financial Services
MDYV
TPHD
Industrials
MDYV
TPHD
Consumer Cyclical
MDYV
TPHD
Real Estate
MDYV
TPHD
Technology
MDYV
TPHD
Energy
MDYV
TPHD
Basic Materials
MDYV
TPHD
Consumer Defensive
MDYV
TPHD
Utilities
MDYV
TPHD
Healthcare
MDYV
TPHD
Communication Services
MDYV
TPHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDYV vs. TPHD — Risk / Return Rank
MDYV
TPHD
MDYV vs. TPHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) and Timothy Plan High Dividend Stock ETF (TPHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MDYV | TPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.22 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | 2.19 | -0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.78 | 6.20 | +0.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MDYV | TPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 1.27 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.59 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.51 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
MDYV vs. TPHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDYV drawdown since its inception was -60.71%, which is greater than TPHD's maximum drawdown of -41.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDYV and TPHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDYV | TPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.71% | -41.71% | -19.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.53% | -6.08% | -4.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.58% | -15.89% | -6.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.58% | -16.54% | -6.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.38% | -3.25% | +2.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.62% | -4.73% | -3.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | 2.14% | +0.92% |
Volatility
MDYV vs. TPHD - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) has a higher volatility of 3.93% compared to Timothy Plan High Dividend Stock ETF (TPHD) at 2.60%. This indicates that MDYV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TPHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDYV | TPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.93% | 2.60% | +1.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.56% | 7.35% | +3.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.25% | 10.48% | +4.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.50% | 14.60% | +4.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.90% | 19.63% | +2.27% |
MDYV vs. TPHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDYV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than TPHD's 0.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
MDYV vs. TPHD - Dividend Comparison
MDYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, less than TPHD's 2.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDYV SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF | 1.73% | 1.72% | 1.89% | 1.59% | 1.90% | 1.74% | 1.69% | 1.83% | 2.28% | 2.48% | 1.83% | 4.31% |
TPHD Timothy Plan High Dividend Stock ETF | 2.00% | 2.10% | 2.09% | 2.19% | 2.38% | 1.86% | 2.38% | 1.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MDYV and TPHD have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MDYV has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to TPHD (2.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDYV dropped -60.71% vs TPHD's -41.71%.
On 5-year performance, TPHD leads with 8.52% vs 7.48% for MDYV. On fees, MDYV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, TPHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, TPHD has performed better with a 8.52% return vs 7.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MDYV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for TPHD.
TPHD has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 1.73% for MDYV.
MDYV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while TPHD tracks Victory US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Weighted BRI Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Timothy Plan. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MDYV and 0.52% for TPHD.
MDYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDYV and TPHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer