MDYV vs. GLD
MDYV (SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF) and GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - MDYV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while GLD is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MDYV returned 10.40%/yr vs 13.12%/yr for GLD. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MDYV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GLD.
Performance
MDYV vs. GLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDYV achieves a 9.04% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's 2.92% return. Over the past 10 years, MDYV has underperformed GLD with an annualized return of 10.40%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.12% annualized return.
MDYV
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- YTD
- 9.04%
- 6M
- 9.24%
- 1Y
- 20.68%
- 3Y*
- 13.90%
- 5Y*
- 7.48%
- 10Y*
- 10.40%
GLD
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 2.92%
- 6M
- 5.43%
- 1Y
- 32.04%
- 3Y*
- 31.09%
- 5Y*
- 18.15%
- 10Y*
- 13.12%
MDYV vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDYV SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF | 9.04% | 7.45% | 11.48% | 15.35% | -7.19% | 30.51% | 3.68% | 25.89% | -11.95% | 12.31% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 2.92% | 63.68% | 26.66% | 12.69% | -0.77% | -4.15% | 24.81% | 17.86% | -1.94% | 12.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDYV and GLD is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2005 | 0.07 |
The correlation between MDYV and GLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (10 years) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MDYV vs. GLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MDYV
GLD
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
MDYV
GLD
-
Industrials
MDYV
GLD
-
Consumer Cyclical
MDYV
GLD
-
Real Estate
MDYV
GLD
-
Technology
MDYV
GLD
-
Energy
MDYV
GLD
-
Basic Materials
MDYV
GLD
Consumer Defensive
MDYV
GLD
-
Utilities
MDYV
GLD
-
Healthcare
MDYV
GLD
-
Communication Services
MDYV
GLD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDYV vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank
MDYV
GLD
MDYV vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MDYV | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.24 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | 1.68 | +0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.78 | 4.15 | +2.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MDYV | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 1.21 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 1.01 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.83 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.60 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
MDYV vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDYV drawdown since its inception was -60.71%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDYV and GLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDYV | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.71% | -45.56% | -15.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.53% | -19.21% | +8.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.58% | -19.21% | -3.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.58% | -21.03% | -1.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.90% | -22.00% | -23.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.38% | -17.75% | +17.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.62% | -16.16% | +7.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | 7.73% | -4.67% |
Volatility
MDYV vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) is 3.93%, while SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a volatility of 5.51%. This indicates that MDYV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDYV | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.93% | 5.51% | -1.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.56% | 23.16% | -12.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.25% | 26.61% | -11.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.50% | 18.00% | +1.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.90% | 15.95% | +5.95% |
MDYV vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDYV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
MDYV vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison
MDYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MDYV SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF | 1.73% | 1.72% | 1.89% | 1.59% | 1.90% | 1.74% | 1.69% | 1.83% | 2.28% | 2.48% | 1.83% | 4.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MDYV and GLD have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLD has higher volatility (5.51%) compared to MDYV (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDYV dropped -60.71% vs GLD's -45.56%.
On 10-year performance, GLD leads with 13.12% vs 10.40% for MDYV. On fees, MDYV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MDYV has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GLD has performed better with a 13.12% return vs 10.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MDYV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.
MDYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.
MDYV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while GLD is Gold. MDYV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MDYV and 0.40% for GLD.
MDYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDYV and GLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer