PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDYV vs. GLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDYV vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDYV achieves a 9.04% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's 2.92% return. Over the past 10 years, MDYV has underperformed GLD with an annualized return of 10.40%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.12% annualized return.


MDYV

1D
-0.38%
1M
1.78%
YTD
9.04%
6M
9.24%
1Y
20.68%
3Y*
13.90%
5Y*
7.48%
10Y*
10.40%

GLD

1D
-0.99%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
2.92%
6M
5.43%
1Y
32.04%
3Y*
31.09%
5Y*
18.15%
10Y*
13.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDYV vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDYV
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF
9.04%7.45%11.48%15.35%-7.19%30.51%3.68%25.89%-11.95%12.31%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
2.92%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%24.81%17.86%-1.94%12.81%

Correlation

The correlation between MDYV and GLD is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2005

0.07

The correlation between MDYV and GLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (10 years) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MDYV vs. GLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MDYV
GLD

Financial Services

21.8%

-

Industrials

18.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

13.5%

-

Real Estate

9.6%

-

Technology

9.3%

-

Energy

7.4%

-

Basic Materials

6.0%
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%

-

Utilities

4.2%

-

Healthcare

3.5%

-

Communication Services

0.5%

-

Financial Services

MDYV
21.8%
GLD

-

Industrials

MDYV
18.8%
GLD

-

Consumer Cyclical

MDYV
13.5%
GLD

-

Real Estate

MDYV
9.6%
GLD

-

Technology

MDYV
9.3%
GLD

-

Energy

MDYV
7.4%
GLD

-

Basic Materials

MDYV
6.0%
GLD
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

MDYV
5.5%
GLD

-

Utilities

MDYV
4.2%
GLD

-

Healthcare

MDYV
3.5%
GLD

-

Communication Services

MDYV
0.5%
GLD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDYV vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDYV
MDYV Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
MDYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDYV Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
MDYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDYV Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDYV vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDYVGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.24

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

1.68

+0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.78

4.15

+2.63

MDYV vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDYV Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDYV and GLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDYVGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

1.21

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

1.01

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.83

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.60

-0.19

Drawdowns

MDYV vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDYV drawdown since its inception was -60.71%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDYV and GLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDYVGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.71%

-45.56%

-15.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.53%

-19.21%

+8.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.58%

-19.21%

-3.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.58%

-21.03%

-1.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.90%

-22.00%

-23.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-17.75%

+17.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.62%

-16.16%

+7.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

7.73%

-4.67%

Volatility

MDYV vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) is 3.93%, while SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a volatility of 5.51%. This indicates that MDYV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDYVGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.93%

5.51%

-1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.56%

23.16%

-12.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.25%

26.61%

-11.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.50%

18.00%

+1.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.90%

15.95%

+5.95%

MDYV vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDYV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

MDYV vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

MDYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MDYV
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF
1.73%1.72%1.89%1.59%1.90%1.74%1.69%1.83%2.28%2.48%1.83%4.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDYV and GLD have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLD has higher volatility (5.51%) compared to MDYV (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDYV dropped -60.71% vs GLD's -45.56%.

On 10-year performance, GLD leads with 13.12% vs 10.40% for MDYV. On fees, MDYV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MDYV has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GLD has performed better with a 13.12% return vs 10.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MDYV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.

MDYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.

MDYV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while GLD is Gold. MDYV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MDYV and 0.40% for GLD.

MDYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDYV and GLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer