PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDYG vs. JSMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDYG vs. JSMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG) and Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MDYG having a 17.08% return and JSMD slightly higher at 17.41%. Over the past 10 years, MDYG has underperformed JSMD with an annualized return of 11.06%, while JSMD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.14% annualized return.


MDYG

1D
-0.40%
1M
-1.93%
6M
9.40%
YTD
17.08%
1Y
24.08%
3Y*
14.59%
5Y*
8.51%
10Y*
11.06%

JSMD

1D
-1.39%
1M
-0.93%
6M
9.85%
YTD
17.41%
1Y
22.75%
3Y*
14.72%
5Y*
8.56%
10Y*
13.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDYG vs. JSMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDYG
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF
17.08%7.22%15.84%17.30%-18.92%18.46%22.57%26.10%-10.46%19.61%
JSMD
Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF
17.41%9.25%15.08%26.81%-22.84%8.40%30.79%31.05%-4.73%24.46%

Correlation

The correlation between MDYG and JSMD is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2016

0.90

The correlation between MDYG and JSMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

MDYG vs. JSMD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MDYG
JSMD

Industrials

30.2%
23.3%

Technology

24.8%
28.1%

Healthcare

13.7%
18.7%

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
8.7%

Financial Services

6.7%
8.9%

Real Estate

5.3%
2.8%

Basic Materials

3.5%
3.0%

Energy

3.2%
1.1%

Utilities

2.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.8%
2.5%

Communication Services

1.4%
2.9%

Industrials

MDYG
30.2%
JSMD
23.3%

Technology

MDYG
24.8%
JSMD
28.1%

Healthcare

MDYG
13.7%
JSMD
18.7%

Consumer Cyclical

MDYG
7.5%
JSMD
8.7%

Financial Services

MDYG
6.7%
JSMD
8.9%

Real Estate

MDYG
5.3%
JSMD
2.8%

Basic Materials

MDYG
3.5%
JSMD
3.0%

Energy

MDYG
3.2%
JSMD
1.1%

Utilities

MDYG
2.0%
JSMD

-

Consumer Defensive

MDYG
1.8%
JSMD
2.5%

Communication Services

MDYG
1.4%
JSMD
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDYG vs. JSMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDYG
MDYG Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
MDYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDYG Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
MDYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDYG Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

JSMD
JSMD Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
JSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
JSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
JSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
JSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDYG vs. JSMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG) and Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MDYGJSMDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.19

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

1.54

+0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.41

5.12

+4.29

MDYG vs. JSMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDYG Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is higher than the JSMD Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDYG and JSMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MDYG vs. JSMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDYG drawdown since its inception was -58.44%, which is greater than JSMD's maximum drawdown of -38.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDYG and JSMD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDYGJSMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.44%

-38.98%

-19.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.91%

-14.86%

+4.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.45%

-24.01%

-1.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.26%

-32.18%

+2.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.27%

-38.98%

-0.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.72%

-5.59%

+1.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.99%

-7.42%

-0.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

4.45%

-1.89%

Volatility

MDYG vs. JSMD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG) is 4.55%, while Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) has a volatility of 6.01%. This indicates that MDYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JSMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDYGJSMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.55%

6.01%

-1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.97%

17.49%

-3.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.75%

22.16%

-4.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.73%

23.09%

-2.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.05%

22.80%

-1.75%

MDYG vs. JSMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDYG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than JSMD's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

MDYG vs. JSMD - Dividend Comparison

MDYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, more than JSMD's 0.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JSMD
Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF
0.43%0.54%0.76%0.44%0.40%0.28%0.24%0.32%0.53%0.30%0.36%0.00%
MDYG
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF
0.59%0.75%0.87%1.20%1.16%0.69%0.71%1.21%1.36%2.23%1.25%2.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, MDYG and JSMD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JSMD has higher volatility (6.01%) compared to MDYG (4.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDYG dropped -58.44% vs JSMD's -38.98%.

On 10-year performance, JSMD leads with 13.14% vs 11.06% for MDYG. On fees, MDYG is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MDYG has been the lower-risk option at 4.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, JSMD has performed better with a 13.14% return vs 11.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MDYG is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for JSMD.

MDYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.59%, compared with 0.43% for JSMD.

MDYG tracks S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index, while JSMD tracks Janus Small Mid Cap Growth Alpha Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MDYG and 0.30% for JSMD.

MDYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDYG and JSMD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer