PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDT vs. HMC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MDT vs. HMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Medtronic plc (MDT) and Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (HMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDT achieves a -15.31% return, which is significantly lower than HMC's -8.51% return. Over the past 10 years, MDT has underperformed HMC with an annualized return of 2.04%, while HMC has yielded a comparatively higher 3.28% annualized return.


MDT

1D
-1.20%
1M
5.96%
YTD
-15.31%
6M
-19.07%
1Y
-4.79%
3Y*
2.04%
5Y*
-5.25%
10Y*
2.04%

HMC

1D
1.01%
1M
10.04%
YTD
-8.51%
6M
-8.11%
1Y
-5.83%
3Y*
-1.40%
5Y*
-0.78%
10Y*
3.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDT vs. HMC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDT
Medtronic plc
-15.31%24.05%0.28%9.58%-22.55%-9.79%5.70%27.34%15.18%15.90%
HMC
Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
-8.51%8.04%-5.14%39.86%-16.69%3.61%2.88%10.34%-20.81%20.02%

Correlation

The correlation between MDT and HMC is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1982

0.23

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MDT:

$103.94B

HMC:

$36.08B

EPS

MDT:

$3.58

HMC:

-$321.49

PS Ratio

MDT:

2.93

HMC:

0.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

MDT:

$35.48B

HMC:

$22.00T

Gross Profit (TTM)

MDT:

$5.78B

HMC:

$3.63T

EBITDA (TTM)

MDT:

$7.11B

HMC:

$1.01T

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDT vs. HMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDT
MDT Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
MDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDT Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
MDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDT Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

HMC
HMC Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
HMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMC Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
HMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMC Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDT vs. HMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Medtronic plc (MDT) and Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (HMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDTHMCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

0.99

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.17

-0.19

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.43

-0.38

-0.05

MDT vs. HMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDT Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is comparable to the HMC Sharpe Ratio of -0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDT and HMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDTHMCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

-0.19

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.24

-0.03

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

0.13

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.17

+0.30

Drawdowns

MDT vs. HMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDT drawdown since its inception was -57.63%, smaller than the maximum HMC drawdown of -90.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDT and HMC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDTHMCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.63%

-90.46%

+32.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.90%

-31.18%

+2.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.90%

-35.41%

+6.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.10%

-35.41%

-9.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.10%

-43.12%

-1.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.81%

-23.09%

-7.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.54%

-36.10%

+19.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.17%

15.43%

-4.26%

Volatility

MDT vs. HMC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Medtronic plc (MDT) is 10.04%, while Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (HMC) has a volatility of 10.95%. This indicates that MDT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDTHMCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.04%

10.95%

-0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.19%

21.03%

-4.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.95%

30.17%

-9.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.93%

26.89%

-4.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.24%

25.45%

-2.21%

Dividends

MDT vs. HMC - Dividend Comparison

MDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, more than HMC's 2.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HMC
Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
2.53%4.67%3.19%3.29%4.00%3.08%2.72%2.90%2.27%2.45%2.87%2.86%
MDT
Medtronic plc
3.52%2.95%3.49%3.34%3.44%2.39%1.95%1.87%2.15%2.24%2.34%1.88%

Financials

MDT vs. HMC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Medtronic plc and Honda Motor Co., Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00T2.00T3.00T4.00T5.00T6.00TJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
9.02B
5.93T
(MDT) Total Revenue
(HMC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MDT and HMC have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HMC has higher volatility (10.95%) compared to MDT (10.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDT dropped -57.63% vs HMC's -90.46%.

HMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.19 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDT and HMC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer