PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDT vs. CSCO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MDT vs. CSCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Medtronic plc (MDT) and Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDT achieves a -15.31% return, which is significantly lower than CSCO's 62.91% return. Over the past 10 years, MDT has underperformed CSCO with an annualized return of 2.04%, while CSCO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.19% annualized return.


MDT

1D
-1.20%
1M
5.96%
YTD
-15.31%
6M
-19.07%
1Y
-4.79%
3Y*
2.04%
5Y*
-5.25%
10Y*
2.04%

CSCO

1D
2.06%
1M
28.56%
YTD
62.91%
6M
59.13%
1Y
92.26%
3Y*
39.53%
5Y*
21.53%
10Y*
19.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDT vs. CSCO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDT
Medtronic plc
-15.31%24.05%0.28%9.58%-22.55%-9.79%5.70%27.34%15.18%15.90%
CSCO
Cisco Systems, Inc.
62.91%33.47%21.00%9.30%-22.46%45.76%-3.49%13.81%16.57%31.27%

Correlation

The correlation between MDT and CSCO is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 1990

0.30

Over the past year, the correlation between MDT and CSCO has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.30, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MDT:

$103.94B

CSCO:

$494.99B

EPS

MDT:

$3.58

CSCO:

$3.00

PE Ratio

MDT:

22.52

CSCO:

41.42

PEG Ratio

MDT:

2.03

CSCO:

34.76

PS Ratio

MDT:

2.93

CSCO:

8.15

Total Revenue (TTM)

MDT:

$35.48B

CSCO:

$60.75B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MDT:

$5.78B

CSCO:

$39.08B

EBITDA (TTM)

MDT:

$7.11B

CSCO:

$13.98B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDT vs. CSCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDT
MDT Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
MDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDT Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
MDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDT Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

CSCO
CSCO Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
CSCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSCO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
CSCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSCO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDT vs. CSCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Medtronic plc (MDT) and Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDTCSCODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.54

-0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.17

6.83

-7.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.43

19.08

-19.51

MDT vs. CSCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDT Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the CSCO Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDT and CSCO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDTCSCODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

3.02

-3.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.24

0.87

-1.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

0.74

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.61

-0.14

Drawdowns

MDT vs. CSCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDT drawdown since its inception was -57.63%, smaller than the maximum CSCO drawdown of -89.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDT and CSCO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDTCSCODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.63%

-89.26%

+31.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.90%

-13.57%

-15.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.90%

-20.16%

-8.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.10%

-36.68%

-8.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.10%

-41.95%

-3.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.81%

-4.50%

-26.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.54%

-40.13%

+23.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.17%

4.86%

+6.31%

Volatility

MDT vs. CSCO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Medtronic plc (MDT) is 10.04%, while Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) has a volatility of 16.93%. This indicates that MDT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDTCSCODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.04%

16.93%

-6.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.19%

26.93%

-10.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.95%

30.76%

-9.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.93%

24.83%

-2.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.24%

25.87%

-2.63%

Dividends

MDT vs. CSCO - Dividend Comparison

MDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, more than CSCO's 1.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSCO
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.33%2.12%2.69%3.07%3.17%2.32%3.20%2.88%2.95%2.95%3.28%3.02%
MDT
Medtronic plc
3.52%2.95%3.49%3.34%3.44%2.39%1.95%1.87%2.15%2.24%2.34%1.88%

Financials

MDT vs. CSCO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Medtronic plc and Cisco Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B16.00B20222023202420252026
9.02B
15.84B
(MDT) Total Revenue
(CSCO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MDT and CSCO have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSCO has higher volatility (16.93%) compared to MDT (10.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDT dropped -57.63% vs CSCO's -89.26%.

CSCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDT and CSCO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer