PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDT vs. CII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDT vs. CII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Medtronic plc (MDT) and BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund (CII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDT achieves a -15.83% return, which is significantly lower than CII's 7.72% return. Over the past 10 years, MDT has underperformed CII with an annualized return of 2.00%, while CII has yielded a comparatively higher 14.94% annualized return.


MDT

1D
-0.16%
1M
5.32%
YTD
-15.83%
6M
-18.44%
1Y
-5.18%
3Y*
1.02%
5Y*
-5.47%
10Y*
2.00%

CII

1D
0.58%
1M
-1.09%
YTD
7.72%
6M
10.66%
1Y
39.37%
3Y*
20.94%
5Y*
13.51%
10Y*
14.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDT vs. CII - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDT
Medtronic plc
-15.83%24.05%0.28%9.58%-22.55%-9.79%5.70%27.34%15.18%15.90%
CII
BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund
7.72%37.78%12.70%18.47%-13.21%34.26%8.11%30.46%-8.60%27.73%

Correlation

The correlation between MDT and CII is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2004

0.39

Over the past year, the correlation between MDT and CII has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDT vs. CII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDT
MDT Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
MDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDT Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
MDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDT Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

CII
CII Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
CII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CII Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CII Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
CII Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
CII Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDT vs. CII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Medtronic plc (MDT) and BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund (CII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MDTCIIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.43

-0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.23

3.33

-3.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.56

12.71

-13.28

MDT vs. CII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDT Sharpe Ratio is -0.31, which is lower than the CII Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDT and CII, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MDT vs. CII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDT drawdown since its inception was -57.63%, roughly equal to the maximum CII drawdown of -56.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDT and CII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDTCIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.63%

-56.43%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.90%

-11.67%

-17.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.90%

-21.05%

-7.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.10%

-22.32%

-22.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.10%

-40.56%

-4.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.23%

-6.33%

-24.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.55%

-6.17%

-10.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.52%

3.05%

+8.47%

Volatility

MDT vs. CII - Volatility Comparison

Medtronic plc (MDT) has a higher volatility of 9.32% compared to BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund (CII) at 5.22%. This indicates that MDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDTCIIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.32%

5.22%

+4.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.28%

12.09%

+4.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.07%

15.40%

+5.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.93%

17.16%

+4.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.25%

18.54%

+4.71%

Dividends

MDT vs. CII - Dividend Comparison

MDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, less than CII's 15.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CII
BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund
15.35%16.65%6.15%6.28%12.27%4.98%6.03%5.79%7.06%6.07%8.38%8.49%
MDT
Medtronic plc
3.54%2.95%3.49%3.34%3.44%2.39%1.95%1.87%2.15%2.24%2.34%1.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDT and CII have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MDT has higher volatility (9.32%) compared to CII (5.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDT dropped -57.63% vs CII's -56.43%.

CII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDT and CII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer