MDPL vs. BNO

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

MDPL (Monarch Dividend Plus ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - MDPL is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Monarch Dividend Plus Index, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Crude Oil Brent ICE Near Term Futures. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, MDPL returned 0.34% vs 36.19% for BNO. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MDPL charges 1.24%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for BNO.

Performance

MDPL vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Monarch Dividend Plus ETF (MDPL) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDPL achieves a -2.31% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 48.83% return.

MDPL

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: -0.74%
• 6M: -6.22%
• YTD: -2.31%
• 1Y: 0.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BNO

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -11.86%
• 6M: 43.76%
• YTD: 48.83%
• 1Y: 36.19%
• 3Y*: 16.16%
• 5Y*: 16.70%
• 10Y*: 11.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDPL vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MDPL Monarch Dividend Plus ETF	-2.31%	7.57%	0.42%
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	48.83%	-5.44%	-0.56%

Correlation

The correlation between MDPL and BNO is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024	0.02

Return for Risk

MDPL vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDPL

MDPL Risk / Return Rank: 9
MDPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
MDPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
MDPL Omega Ratio Rank: 8
MDPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
MDPL Martin Ratio Rank: 9

BNO

BNO Risk / Return Rank: 31
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 33
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDPL vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch Dividend Plus ETF (MDPL) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MDPL	BNO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.03	0.95	-0.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.07	1.50	-1.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.19	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.04	1.15	-1.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.10	3.44	-3.54

MDPL vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDPL Sharpe Ratio is -0.03, which is lower than the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDPL and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MDPL vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDPL drawdown since its inception was -14.21%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDPL and BNO.

Drawdown Indicators

	MDPL	BNO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.21%	-87.06%	+72.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.38%	-34.46%	+22.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-34.46%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.46%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.80%	-29.90%	+23.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.54%	-40.07%	+35.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.51%	11.55%	-6.04%

Volatility

MDPL vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Monarch Dividend Plus ETF (MDPL) is 6.12%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 13.12%. This indicates that MDPL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MDPL	BNO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.12%	13.12%	-7.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.95%	38.38%	-26.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.92%	41.83%	-25.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.36%	35.87%	-20.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.36%	36.71%	-21.35%

MDPL vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDPL has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than BNO's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

MDPL vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

MDPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MDPL Monarch Dividend Plus ETF	1.58%	1.42%	1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MDPL and BNO in my portfolio?

MDPL and BNO have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MDPL or BNO?

BNO has higher volatility (13.12%) compared to MDPL (6.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDPL dropped -14.21% vs BNO's -87.06%.

Which ETF is better, MDPL or BNO?

On 1-year performance, BNO leads with 36.19% vs 0.34% for MDPL. On fees, BNO is cheaper at 1.00% per year. On volatility, MDPL has been the lower-risk option at 6.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MDPL or BNO?

Over the 1-year period, BNO has performed better with a 36.19% return vs 0.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MDPL or BNO?

BNO is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.24% for MDPL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MDPL or BNO?

MDPL has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

What is the main difference between MDPL and BNO?

MDPL is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while BNO is Oil & Gas. MDPL tracks Monarch Dividend Plus Index, while BNO tracks Crude Oil Brent ICE Near Term Futures. They also come from different issuers: Monarch and USCF Investments. Their fees differ too: 1.24% for MDPL and 1.00% for BNO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BNO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.