PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDOEX vs. COBYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDOEX vs. COBYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Developing Opportunity Portfolio (MDOEX) and The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDOEX achieves a 16.88% return, which is significantly higher than COBYX's 9.83% return.


MDOEX

1D
-1.25%
1M
10.14%
YTD
16.88%
6M
15.93%
1Y
15.61%
3Y*
14.44%
5Y*
-2.35%
10Y*

COBYX

1D
-0.82%
1M
0.68%
YTD
9.83%
6M
12.54%
1Y
14.12%
3Y*
8.68%
5Y*
7.72%
10Y*
4.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDOEX vs. COBYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MDOEX
Morgan Stanley Developing Opportunity Portfolio
16.88%8.28%16.79%5.36%-30.36%-18.69%45.00%
COBYX
The Cook & Bynum Fund
9.83%20.50%-10.32%16.73%9.28%9.05%-9.15%

Correlation

The correlation between MDOEX and COBYX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2020

0.46

The correlation between MDOEX and COBYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDOEX vs. COBYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDOEX
MDOEX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
MDOEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDOEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDOEX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
MDOEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDOEX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

COBYX
COBYX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
COBYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COBYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
COBYX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
COBYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
COBYX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDOEX vs. COBYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Developing Opportunity Portfolio (MDOEX) and The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDOEXCOBYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.22

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.75

1.59

-0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.05

5.05

-3.00

MDOEX vs. COBYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDOEX Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the COBYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDOEX and COBYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDOEXCOBYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

1.21

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

0.56

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.38

-0.22

Drawdowns

MDOEX vs. COBYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDOEX drawdown since its inception was -59.92%, which is greater than COBYX's maximum drawdown of -34.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDOEX and COBYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDOEXCOBYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.92%

-34.18%

-25.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.82%

-8.95%

-12.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.82%

-16.29%

-5.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.60%

-17.10%

-35.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.05%

-1.93%

-24.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.04%

-6.80%

-28.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.96%

2.99%

+4.97%

Volatility

MDOEX vs. COBYX - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley Developing Opportunity Portfolio (MDOEX) has a higher volatility of 10.98% compared to The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX) at 3.71%. This indicates that MDOEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COBYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDOEXCOBYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.98%

3.71%

+7.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.20%

9.51%

+9.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.79%

11.81%

+9.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.58%

13.99%

+9.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.80%

13.64%

+11.16%

MDOEX vs. COBYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDOEX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than COBYX's 1.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

MDOEX vs. COBYX - Dividend Comparison

MDOEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than COBYX's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
COBYX
The Cook & Bynum Fund
1.07%1.18%0.00%1.01%1.16%2.18%0.32%0.69%12.60%1.88%5.09%
MDOEX
Morgan Stanley Developing Opportunity Portfolio
0.63%0.74%0.76%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDOEX and COBYX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MDOEX has higher volatility (10.98%) compared to COBYX (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDOEX dropped -59.92% vs COBYX's -34.18%.

COBYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDOEX and COBYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer