MDLZ vs. JEPQ
MDLZ (Mondelez International, Inc.) is a stock, while JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index. Over the past 3 years, MDLZ returned -3.33%/yr vs 18.89%/yr for JEPQ. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MDLZ vs. JEPQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDLZ achieves a 13.10% return, which is significantly higher than JEPQ's 8.49% return.
MDLZ
- 1D
- 1.75%
- 1M
- -4.17%
- 6M
- 10.86%
- YTD
- 13.10%
- 1Y
- -7.80%
- 3Y*
- -3.33%
- 5Y*
- 1.48%
- 10Y*
- 5.27%
JEPQ
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- 6M
- 6.42%
- YTD
- 8.49%
- 1Y
- 22.08%
- 3Y*
- 18.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MDLZ vs. JEPQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | 13.10% | -7.03% | -15.30% | 11.17% | 4.91% |
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 8.49% | 15.18% | 24.85% | 36.28% | -11.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDLZ and JEPQ is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2022 | 0.12 |
The correlation between MDLZ and JEPQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDLZ vs. JEPQ — Risk / Return Rank
MDLZ
JEPQ
MDLZ vs. JEPQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MDLZ | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.31 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.30 | 2.52 | -2.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.52 | 11.61 | -12.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MDLZ vs. JEPQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDLZ drawdown since its inception was -42.52%, which is greater than JEPQ's maximum drawdown of -20.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDLZ and JEPQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDLZ | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.52% | -20.07% | -22.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.93% | -8.82% | -17.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.00% | -20.07% | -8.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.24% | -2.03% | -14.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.05% | -3.37% | -7.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.08% | 1.91% | +13.17% |
Volatility
MDLZ vs. JEPQ - Volatility Comparison
Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) has a higher volatility of 8.44% compared to JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) at 6.46%. This indicates that MDLZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDLZ | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.44% | 6.46% | +1.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.21% | 11.30% | +5.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.10% | 13.75% | +9.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.83% | 16.82% | +3.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.99% | 16.82% | +4.17% |
Dividends
MDLZ vs. JEPQ - Dividend Comparison
MDLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, less than JEPQ's 10.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 10.51% | 10.53% | 9.65% | 10.03% | 9.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | 3.34% | 3.60% | 3.00% | 2.24% | 2.21% | 2.01% | 2.05% | 1.98% | 2.40% | 1.92% | 1.62% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MDLZ and JEPQ have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MDLZ has higher volatility (8.44%) compared to JEPQ (6.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDLZ dropped -42.52% vs JEPQ's -20.07%.
JEPQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDLZ and JEPQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer