MDLZ vs. DBC
MDLZ (Mondelez International, Inc.) is a stock, while DBC (Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund) is Commodities fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. Over the past 10 years, MDLZ returned 5.51%/yr vs 9.10%/yr for DBC. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MDLZ vs. DBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDLZ achieves a 14.88% return, which is significantly lower than DBC's 35.47% return. Over the past 10 years, MDLZ has underperformed DBC with an annualized return of 5.51%, while DBC has yielded a comparatively higher 9.10% annualized return.
MDLZ
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- YTD
- 14.88%
- 6M
- 11.39%
- 1Y
- -5.50%
- 3Y*
- -3.54%
- 5Y*
- 1.73%
- 10Y*
- 5.51%
DBC
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -3.32%
- YTD
- 35.47%
- 6M
- 35.36%
- 1Y
- 45.90%
- 3Y*
- 15.09%
- 5Y*
- 12.78%
- 10Y*
- 9.10%
MDLZ vs. DBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | 14.88% | -7.03% | -15.30% | 11.17% | 2.92% | 15.87% | 8.58% | 40.42% | -4.27% | -1.58% |
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 35.47% | 8.10% | 2.18% | -6.19% | 19.34% | 41.36% | -7.84% | 11.84% | -11.63% | 4.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDLZ and DBC is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2006 | 0.14 |
The correlation between MDLZ and DBC shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (3 years) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDLZ vs. DBC — Risk / Return Rank
MDLZ
DBC
MDLZ vs. DBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) and Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MDLZ | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.43 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.21 | 6.54 | -6.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.38 | 13.91 | -14.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MDLZ | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.25 | 2.47 | -2.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | 0.67 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 0.51 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.12 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
MDLZ vs. DBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDLZ drawdown since its inception was -42.52%, smaller than the maximum DBC drawdown of -76.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDLZ and DBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDLZ | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.52% | -76.36% | +33.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.93% | -7.05% | -18.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.00% | -13.82% | -15.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.14% | -27.34% | -1.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.74% | -41.71% | +11.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.92% | -21.64% | +6.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.03% | -46.22% | +35.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.61% | 3.31% | +11.30% |
Volatility
MDLZ vs. DBC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) is 4.17%, while Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) has a volatility of 6.45%. This indicates that MDLZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDLZ | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.17% | 6.45% | -2.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.04% | 15.75% | +0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.99% | 18.68% | +3.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.46% | 19.18% | +0.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.02% | 17.81% | +3.21% |
Dividends
MDLZ vs. DBC - Dividend Comparison
MDLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, more than DBC's 2.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 2.46% | 3.33% | 5.22% | 4.94% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.59% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | 3.21% | 3.60% | 3.00% | 2.24% | 2.21% | 2.01% | 2.05% | 1.98% | 2.40% | 1.92% | 1.62% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MDLZ and DBC have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBC has higher volatility (6.45%) compared to MDLZ (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDLZ dropped -42.52% vs DBC's -76.36%.
DBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDLZ and DBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer