MDLZ vs. BBDC
MDLZ (Mondelez International, Inc.) and BBDC (Barings BDC, Inc.) are both stocks. MDLZ operates in Confectioners (Consumer Defensive), while BBDC operates in Credit Services (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, MDLZ returned 2.36%/yr vs 6.45%/yr for BBDC. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MDLZ vs. BBDC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDLZ achieves a 18.03% return, which is significantly higher than BBDC's -2.86% return.
MDLZ
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 3.31%
- YTD
- 18.03%
- 6M
- 18.65%
- 1Y
- -2.75%
- 3Y*
- -1.98%
- 5Y*
- 2.36%
- 10Y*
- 6.09%
BBDC
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- -2.86%
- 6M
- -1.25%
- 1Y
- 4.66%
- 3Y*
- 14.63%
- 5Y*
- 6.45%
- 10Y*
- —
MDLZ vs. BBDC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | 18.03% | -7.03% | -15.30% | 11.17% | 2.92% | 15.87% | 8.58% | 40.42% | -6.08% |
BBDC Barings BDC, Inc. | -2.86% | 8.84% | 23.86% | 18.53% | -18.59% | 29.31% | -3.48% | 20.40% | -9.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDLZ and BBDC is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2018 | 0.20 |
The correlation between MDLZ and BBDC shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MDLZ:
$2.68
BBDC:
$0.66
MDLZ:
23.51
BBDC:
12.71
MDLZ:
1.56
BBDC:
5.06
MDLZ:
$39.30B
BBDC:
$174.30M
MDLZ:
$11.31B
BBDC:
$149.47M
MDLZ:
$4.67B
BBDC:
$90.27M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDLZ vs. BBDC — Risk / Return Rank
MDLZ
BBDC
MDLZ vs. BBDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) and Barings BDC, Inc. (BBDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MDLZ | BBDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.05 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.17 | 0.33 | -0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.30 | 0.73 | -1.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MDLZ vs. BBDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDLZ drawdown since its inception was -42.52%, smaller than the maximum BBDC drawdown of -48.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDLZ and BBDC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDLZ | BBDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.52% | -48.45% | +5.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.93% | -12.28% | -13.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.00% | -24.51% | -4.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.14% | -27.55% | -1.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.59% | -6.42% | -6.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.03% | -7.98% | -3.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.70% | 5.59% | +9.11% |
Volatility
MDLZ vs. BBDC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) is 5.46%, while Barings BDC, Inc. (BBDC) has a volatility of 6.34%. This indicates that MDLZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDLZ | BBDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.46% | 6.34% | -0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.28% | 15.12% | +1.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.26% | 18.60% | +3.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.52% | 19.39% | +0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.03% | 24.21% | -3.18% |
Dividends
MDLZ vs. BBDC - Dividend Comparison
MDLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, less than BBDC's 12.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBDC Barings BDC, Inc. | 12.99% | 12.96% | 10.87% | 11.89% | 11.66% | 7.44% | 7.07% | 5.25% | 21.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | 3.13% | 3.60% | 3.00% | 2.24% | 2.21% | 2.01% | 2.05% | 1.98% | 2.40% | 1.92% | 1.62% | 1.43% |
Financials
MDLZ vs. BBDC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mondelez International, Inc. and Barings BDC, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MDLZ and BBDC have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBDC has higher volatility (6.34%) compared to MDLZ (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDLZ dropped -42.52% vs BBDC's -48.45%.
BBDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.22 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDLZ and BBDC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer