PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDLV vs. IWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDLV vs. IWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF (MDLV) and iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF (IWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDLV achieves a 10.95% return, which is significantly lower than IWX's 14.74% return.


MDLV

1D
0.67%
1M
2.12%
YTD
10.95%
6M
11.88%
1Y
21.29%
3Y*
13.07%
5Y*
10Y*

IWX

1D
0.84%
1M
4.24%
YTD
14.74%
6M
15.73%
1Y
30.38%
3Y*
19.30%
5Y*
11.25%
10Y*
11.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDLV vs. IWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
MDLV
Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF
10.95%13.30%10.16%0.68%
IWX
iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF
14.74%18.23%14.89%10.15%

Correlation

The correlation between MDLV and IWX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2023

0.82

The correlation between MDLV and IWX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MDLV vs. IWX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MDLV
IWX

Utilities

15.2%
3.2%

Industrials

15.0%
11.3%

Financial Services

14.9%
21.5%

Energy

14.4%
6.4%

Technology

9.3%
14.2%

Consumer Defensive

8.2%
8.2%

Healthcare

7.9%
12.5%

Communication Services

6.4%
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

3.9%
6.8%

Basic Materials

2.6%
3.0%

Real Estate

2.2%
1.9%

Utilities

MDLV
15.2%
IWX
3.2%

Industrials

MDLV
15.0%
IWX
11.3%

Financial Services

MDLV
14.9%
IWX
21.5%

Energy

MDLV
14.4%
IWX
6.4%

Technology

MDLV
9.3%
IWX
14.2%

Consumer Defensive

MDLV
8.2%
IWX
8.2%

Healthcare

MDLV
7.9%
IWX
12.5%

Communication Services

MDLV
6.4%
IWX
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

MDLV
3.9%
IWX
6.8%

Basic Materials

MDLV
2.6%
IWX
3.0%

Real Estate

MDLV
2.2%
IWX
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDLV vs. IWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDLV
MDLV Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
MDLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDLV Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
MDLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDLV Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

IWX
IWX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
IWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
IWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDLV vs. IWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF (MDLV) and iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF (IWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDLVIWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.55

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.01

4.63

+0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.75

19.89

-4.14

MDLV vs. IWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDLV Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the IWX Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDLV and IWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDLVIWXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

3.05

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

0.71

+0.37

Drawdowns

MDLV vs. IWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDLV drawdown since its inception was -10.71%, smaller than the maximum IWX drawdown of -35.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDLV and IWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDLVIWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.71%

-35.76%

+25.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.27%

-6.59%

+2.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.71%

-13.37%

+2.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

0.00%

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.29%

-3.82%

+1.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.36%

1.53%

-0.17%

Volatility

MDLV vs. IWX - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF (MDLV) and iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF (IWX) have volatilities of 2.83% and 2.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDLVIWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.83%

2.76%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.58%

7.69%

-1.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.77%

10.04%

-1.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.51%

13.85%

-3.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.51%

16.51%

-6.00%

MDLV vs. IWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDLV has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than IWX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

MDLV vs. IWX - Dividend Comparison

MDLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, more than IWX's 1.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWX
iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF
1.47%1.59%1.97%2.13%2.07%1.79%2.12%2.60%2.66%2.12%2.22%2.77%
MDLV
Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF
2.78%3.00%2.78%2.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDLV and IWX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MDLV has higher volatility (2.83%) compared to IWX (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDLV dropped -10.71% vs IWX's -35.76%.

On 3-year performance, IWX leads with 19.30% vs 13.07% for MDLV. On fees, IWX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, IWX has performed better with a 19.30% return vs 13.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for MDLV.

MDLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 1.47% for IWX.

They also come from different issuers: Morgan Dempsey and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for MDLV and 0.20% for IWX.

IWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDLV and IWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer