PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDLV vs. ILCV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MDLV vs. ILCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF (MDLV) and iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MDLV vs. ILCV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
MDLV
Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF
7.20%13.30%10.16%0.68%
ILCV
iShares Morningstar Value ETF
-0.92%18.79%17.03%13.63%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDLV achieves a 7.20% return, which is significantly higher than ILCV's -0.92% return.


MDLV

1D
0.91%
1M
-2.09%
YTD
7.20%
6M
9.39%
1Y
14.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ILCV

1D
1.96%
1M
-4.49%
YTD
-0.92%
6M
4.39%
1Y
16.47%
3Y*
15.74%
5Y*
10.84%
10Y*
10.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MDLV vs. ILCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDLV has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCV's 0.04% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MDLV vs. ILCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDLV
MDLV Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
MDLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDLV Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
MDLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDLV Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

ILCV
ILCV Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ILCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCV Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDLV vs. ILCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF (MDLV) and iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDLVILCVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.23

1.08

+0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.68

1.57

+0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.24

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

1.50

+0.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.93

7.14

-0.21

MDLV vs. ILCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is comparable to the ILCV Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDLV and ILCV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDLVILCVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

1.08

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.02

0.44

+0.58

Correlation

The correlation between MDLV and ILCV is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

MDLV vs. ILCV - Dividend Comparison

MDLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, more than ILCV's 1.77% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDLV
Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF
2.88%3.00%2.78%2.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ILCV
iShares Morningstar Value ETF
1.77%1.77%1.99%2.27%2.32%2.01%2.96%2.70%2.93%2.32%2.76%3.01%

Drawdowns

MDLV vs. ILCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDLV drawdown since its inception was -10.71%, smaller than the maximum ILCV drawdown of -58.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDLV and ILCV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MDLVILCVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.71%

-58.63%

+47.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.72%

-11.82%

+2.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.53%

-4.72%

+2.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.34%

-9.39%

+7.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

2.48%

-0.26%

Volatility

MDLV vs. ILCV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF (MDLV) is 2.54%, while iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) has a volatility of 3.81%. This indicates that MDLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ILCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MDLVILCVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.54%

3.81%

-1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.50%

7.65%

-1.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.90%

15.31%

-3.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.56%

14.26%

-3.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.56%

16.68%

-6.12%