MDLRX vs. ECAT
MDLRX (BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Core Fund) and ECAT (BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust) are both mutual funds - MDLRX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Index, while ECAT is a Derivative Income fund managed by BlackRock. Over the past 3 years, MDLRX returned 24.13%/yr vs 19.60%/yr for ECAT. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MDLRX charges 0.73%/yr vs 1.38%/yr for ECAT.
Performance
MDLRX vs. ECAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDLRX achieves a 12.37% return, which is significantly higher than ECAT's 11.44% return.
MDLRX
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 4.45%
- YTD
- 12.37%
- 6M
- 13.10%
- 1Y
- 33.06%
- 3Y*
- 24.13%
- 5Y*
- 13.52%
- 10Y*
- 15.32%
ECAT
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 6.55%
- YTD
- 11.44%
- 6M
- 9.71%
- 1Y
- 20.46%
- 3Y*
- 19.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MDLRX vs. ECAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDLRX BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Core Fund | 12.37% | 20.08% | 25.33% | 25.28% | -20.31% | 8.97% |
ECAT BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust | 11.44% | 16.64% | 19.96% | 32.36% | -21.90% | -6.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDLRX and ECAT is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2021 | 0.73 |
The correlation between MDLRX and ECAT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDLRX vs. ECAT — Risk / Return Rank
MDLRX
ECAT
MDLRX vs. ECAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Core Fund (MDLRX) and BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MDLRX | ECAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.27 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.84 | 1.74 | +2.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.14 | 6.53 | +12.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MDLRX | ECAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.73 | 1.53 | +1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.55 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
MDLRX vs. ECAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDLRX drawdown since its inception was -54.46%, which is greater than ECAT's maximum drawdown of -32.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDLRX and ECAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDLRX | ECAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.46% | -32.23% | -22.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.69% | -11.80% | +3.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.63% | -15.79% | -3.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | -1.01% | +0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.61% | -9.11% | -2.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.74% | 3.14% | -1.40% |
Volatility
MDLRX vs. ECAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Core Fund (MDLRX) is 2.95%, while BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT) has a volatility of 3.31%. This indicates that MDLRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ECAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDLRX | ECAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.95% | 3.31% | -0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.38% | 10.50% | -1.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.24% | 13.43% | -1.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.36% | 16.89% | +0.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.38% | 16.89% | +1.49% |
MDLRX vs. ECAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDLRX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than ECAT's 1.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
MDLRX vs. ECAT - Dividend Comparison
MDLRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.02%, less than ECAT's 21.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECAT BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust | 21.67% | 23.00% | 17.44% | 9.14% | 8.94% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MDLRX BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Core Fund | 8.02% | 9.01% | 14.81% | 0.81% | 6.61% | 20.27% | 4.75% | 3.99% | 10.26% | 37.74% | 6.17% | 2.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MDLRX and ECAT have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ECAT has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to MDLRX (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDLRX dropped -54.46% vs ECAT's -32.23%.
MDLRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDLRX and ECAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer