PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDLOX vs. WFSPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDLOX vs. WFSPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (MDLOX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K (WFSPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDLOX achieves a 8.22% return, which is significantly lower than WFSPX's 9.77% return. Over the past 10 years, MDLOX has underperformed WFSPX with an annualized return of 8.60%, while WFSPX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.68% annualized return.


MDLOX

1D
-0.41%
1M
1.91%
YTD
8.22%
6M
7.74%
1Y
19.34%
3Y*
14.36%
5Y*
5.91%
10Y*
8.60%

WFSPX

1D
-0.36%
1M
0.10%
YTD
9.77%
6M
8.77%
1Y
25.45%
3Y*
21.35%
5Y*
13.57%
10Y*
15.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDLOX vs. WFSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDLOX
BlackRock Global Allocation Fund
8.22%19.38%9.00%12.35%-16.08%6.40%24.62%17.23%-7.66%13.30%
WFSPX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K
9.77%17.83%24.94%26.25%-18.14%28.63%18.43%31.45%-4.83%21.27%

Correlation

The correlation between MDLOX and WFSPX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 1994

0.81

The correlation between MDLOX and WFSPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (all time) to 0.91 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDLOX vs. WFSPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDLOX
MDLOX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
MDLOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDLOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDLOX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
MDLOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDLOX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

WFSPX
WFSPX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
WFSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
WFSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDLOX vs. WFSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (MDLOX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K (WFSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MDLOXWFSPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.39

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

3.01

-0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.28

13.58

-3.30

MDLOX vs. WFSPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDLOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the WFSPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDLOX and WFSPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MDLOX vs. WFSPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDLOX drawdown since its inception was -32.96%, smaller than the maximum WFSPX drawdown of -58.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDLOX and WFSPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDLOXWFSPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.96%

-58.21%

+25.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.30%

-8.90%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.08%

-18.74%

+8.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.89%

-24.51%

+1.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.89%

-33.74%

+10.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-1.72%

+1.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.47%

-12.76%

+8.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

1.97%

-0.01%

Volatility

MDLOX vs. WFSPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (MDLOX) is 4.05%, while iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K (WFSPX) has a volatility of 4.67%. This indicates that MDLOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WFSPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDLOXWFSPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

4.67%

-0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.61%

9.83%

-1.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.22%

12.49%

-2.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.96%

16.97%

-6.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.76%

18.07%

-7.31%

MDLOX vs. WFSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDLOX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than WFSPX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

MDLOX vs. WFSPX - Dividend Comparison

MDLOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.38%, more than WFSPX's 1.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDLOX
BlackRock Global Allocation Fund
8.38%9.07%7.50%1.15%5.98%10.11%10.01%5.44%5.21%4.56%1.81%9.49%
WFSPX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K
1.59%1.72%1.41%1.50%2.02%1.82%1.66%1.99%2.00%1.62%2.37%2.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, MDLOX and WFSPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

WFSPX has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to MDLOX (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDLOX dropped -32.96% vs WFSPX's -58.21%.

WFSPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDLOX and WFSPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer