PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDLOX vs. RAPZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDLOX vs. RAPZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (MDLOX) and Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc (RAPZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDLOX achieves a 8.12% return, which is significantly lower than RAPZX's 13.81% return. Over the past 10 years, MDLOX has outperformed RAPZX with an annualized return of 8.33%, while RAPZX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.83% annualized return.


MDLOX

1D
0.32%
1M
4.30%
YTD
8.12%
6M
9.24%
1Y
20.25%
3Y*
14.59%
5Y*
5.80%
10Y*
8.33%

RAPZX

1D
0.56%
1M
-1.26%
YTD
13.81%
6M
8.58%
1Y
17.74%
3Y*
12.14%
5Y*
7.37%
10Y*
6.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDLOX vs. RAPZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDLOX
BlackRock Global Allocation Fund
8.12%19.38%9.00%12.35%-16.08%6.40%24.62%17.23%-7.66%13.30%
RAPZX
Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc
13.81%11.96%4.35%3.88%-2.05%23.51%-0.84%17.77%-8.44%6.51%

Correlation

The correlation between MDLOX and RAPZX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between MDLOX and RAPZX has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDLOX vs. RAPZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDLOX
MDLOX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
MDLOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDLOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDLOX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
MDLOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDLOX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

RAPZX
RAPZX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
RAPZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RAPZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
RAPZX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
RAPZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
RAPZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDLOX vs. RAPZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (MDLOX) and Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc (RAPZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDLOXRAPZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.36

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

2.99

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.58

11.16

-0.58

MDLOX vs. RAPZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDLOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the RAPZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDLOX and RAPZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDLOXRAPZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

1.77

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.58

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.54

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.36

+0.44

Drawdowns

MDLOX vs. RAPZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDLOX drawdown since its inception was -32.96%, which is greater than RAPZX's maximum drawdown of -30.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDLOX and RAPZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDLOXRAPZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.96%

-30.69%

-2.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.30%

-5.96%

-2.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.08%

-8.84%

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.89%

-19.31%

-3.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.89%

-30.69%

+7.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.03%

+2.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.48%

-8.06%

+3.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

1.59%

+0.34%

Volatility

MDLOX vs. RAPZX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (MDLOX) has a higher volatility of 2.91% compared to Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc (RAPZX) at 2.18%. This indicates that MDLOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RAPZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDLOXRAPZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

2.18%

+0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.81%

8.80%

-0.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.56%

10.15%

-0.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.85%

12.83%

-1.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.71%

12.78%

-2.07%

MDLOX vs. RAPZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDLOX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than RAPZX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

MDLOX vs. RAPZX - Dividend Comparison

MDLOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.39%, more than RAPZX's 1.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDLOX
BlackRock Global Allocation Fund
8.39%9.07%7.50%1.15%5.98%10.11%10.01%5.44%5.21%4.56%1.81%9.49%
RAPZX
Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc
1.27%1.44%3.20%2.71%3.08%9.61%1.71%2.85%2.06%1.76%2.83%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDLOX and RAPZX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MDLOX has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to RAPZX (2.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDLOX dropped -32.96% vs RAPZX's -30.69%.

MDLOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDLOX and RAPZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer