PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDIZX vs. RWIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDIZX vs. RWIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS International Diversification Fund R6 (MDIZX) and Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund (RWIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MDIZX having a 10.30% return and RWIIX slightly lower at 10.10%.


MDIZX

1D
0.62%
1M
4.50%
YTD
10.30%
6M
12.32%
1Y
23.03%
3Y*
16.46%
5Y*
7.33%
10Y*

RWIIX

1D
0.35%
1M
3.63%
YTD
10.10%
6M
12.82%
1Y
24.17%
3Y*
5.50%
5Y*
1.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDIZX vs. RWIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDIZX
MFS International Diversification Fund R6
10.30%27.99%6.52%14.48%-17.04%7.79%15.45%26.09%-10.93%0.86%
RWIIX
Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund
10.10%7.87%-6.03%9.07%-11.57%10.68%14.57%4.58%-2.46%0.62%

Correlation

The correlation between MDIZX and RWIIX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2017

0.63

The correlation between MDIZX and RWIIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (all time) to 0.79 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDIZX vs. RWIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDIZX
MDIZX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
MDIZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDIZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDIZX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
MDIZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDIZX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

RWIIX
RWIIX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
RWIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
RWIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDIZX vs. RWIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS International Diversification Fund R6 (MDIZX) and Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund (RWIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDIZXRWIIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.41

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

3.41

-1.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.50

9.13

-1.62

MDIZX vs. RWIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDIZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the RWIIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDIZX and RWIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDIZXRWIIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

2.14

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.16

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.38

+0.21

Drawdowns

MDIZX vs. RWIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDIZX drawdown since its inception was -30.09%, which is greater than RWIIX's maximum drawdown of -20.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDIZX and RWIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDIZXRWIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.09%

-20.34%

-9.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.36%

-6.94%

-4.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.59%

-20.34%

+7.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.09%

-20.34%

-9.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.70%

-7.82%

+1.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

2.59%

+0.41%

Volatility

MDIZX vs. RWIIX - Volatility Comparison

MFS International Diversification Fund R6 (MDIZX) has a higher volatility of 3.98% compared to Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund (RWIIX) at 3.55%. This indicates that MDIZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RWIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDIZXRWIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.98%

3.55%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.15%

8.34%

+1.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.49%

11.06%

+1.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.22%

11.53%

+2.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.20%

10.91%

+4.29%

MDIZX vs. RWIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDIZX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than RWIIX's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

MDIZX vs. RWIIX - Dividend Comparison

MDIZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.77%, less than RWIIX's 7.93% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDIZX
MFS International Diversification Fund R6
4.77%5.26%3.61%4.24%2.76%2.79%1.72%2.57%3.23%1.66%
RWIIX
Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund
7.93%8.74%0.00%6.82%1.72%14.15%6.51%1.84%0.86%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDIZX and RWIIX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MDIZX has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to RWIIX (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDIZX dropped -30.09% vs RWIIX's -20.34%.

RWIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDIZX and RWIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer