MDIZX vs. FHLFX
MDIZX (MFS International Diversification Fund R6) and FHLFX (Fidelity Series International Index Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, MDIZX returned 6.82%/yr vs 8.69%/yr for FHLFX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MDIZX charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for FHLFX.
Performance
MDIZX vs. FHLFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDIZX achieves a 7.49% return, which is significantly lower than FHLFX's 8.47% return.
MDIZX
- 1D
- -2.35%
- 1M
- -0.53%
- YTD
- 7.49%
- 6M
- 7.33%
- 1Y
- 18.63%
- 3Y*
- 15.48%
- 5Y*
- 6.82%
- 10Y*
- —
FHLFX
- 1D
- -2.03%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 8.47%
- 6M
- 8.18%
- 1Y
- 20.64%
- 3Y*
- 16.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.69%
- 10Y*
- —
MDIZX vs. FHLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDIZX MFS International Diversification Fund R6 | 7.49% | 27.99% | 6.52% | 14.48% | -17.04% | 7.79% | 15.45% | 26.09% | -12.03% |
FHLFX Fidelity Series International Index Fund | 8.47% | 31.96% | 3.67% | 18.16% | -14.17% | 11.23% | 8.09% | 21.66% | -10.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDIZX and FHLFX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018 | 0.94 |
The correlation between MDIZX and FHLFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDIZX vs. FHLFX — Risk / Return Rank
MDIZX
FHLFX
MDIZX vs. FHLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS International Diversification Fund R6 (MDIZX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MDIZX | FHLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.26 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 1.95 | -0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.73 | 7.30 | -0.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MDIZX vs. FHLFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDIZX drawdown since its inception was -30.09%, smaller than the maximum FHLFX drawdown of -33.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDIZX and FHLFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDIZX | FHLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.09% | -33.58% | +3.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.36% | -11.37% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.59% | -13.62% | +1.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.09% | -29.36% | -0.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.55% | -2.03% | -0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.66% | -6.07% | -0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 3.04% | -0.02% |
Volatility
MDIZX vs. FHLFX - Volatility Comparison
MFS International Diversification Fund R6 (MDIZX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) have volatilities of 5.42% and 5.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDIZX | FHLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.42% | 5.20% | +0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.27% | 12.87% | -1.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.30% | 15.39% | -2.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.38% | 16.09% | -1.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.24% | 17.66% | -2.42% |
MDIZX vs. FHLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDIZX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than FHLFX's 0.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
MDIZX vs. FHLFX - Dividend Comparison
MDIZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%, more than FHLFX's 3.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHLFX Fidelity Series International Index Fund | 3.19% | 3.46% | 2.98% | 2.86% | 2.60% | 2.47% | 1.92% | 1.95% | 0.62% | 0.00% |
MDIZX MFS International Diversification Fund R6 | 4.89% | 5.26% | 3.61% | 4.24% | 2.76% | 2.79% | 1.72% | 2.57% | 3.23% | 1.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, MDIZX and FHLFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
MDIZX has higher volatility (5.42%) compared to FHLFX (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDIZX dropped -30.09% vs FHLFX's -33.58%.
MDIZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDIZX and FHLFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer