PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDISX vs. SBLGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDISX vs. SBLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Fund (MDISX) and ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund (SBLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDISX achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly lower than SBLGX's 5.90% return. Over the past 10 years, MDISX has underperformed SBLGX with an annualized return of 8.58%, while SBLGX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.55% annualized return.


MDISX

1D
-0.15%
1M
1.37%
YTD
1.50%
6M
3.70%
1Y
13.36%
3Y*
14.41%
5Y*
9.11%
10Y*
8.58%

SBLGX

1D
-0.59%
1M
5.99%
YTD
5.90%
6M
5.60%
1Y
13.35%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
10.45%
10Y*
14.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDISX vs. SBLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDISX
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Fund
1.50%23.75%6.38%20.48%-4.73%19.60%-4.38%24.74%-10.86%7.22%
SBLGX
ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund
5.90%8.44%27.60%45.00%-32.96%21.71%30.84%31.69%-0.44%25.06%

Correlation

The correlation between MDISX and SBLGX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1998

0.67

The correlation between MDISX and SBLGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDISX vs. SBLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDISX
MDISX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
MDISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDISX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
MDISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDISX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

SBLGX
SBLGX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
SBLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
SBLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDISX vs. SBLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Fund (MDISX) and ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund (SBLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDISXSBLGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.16

0.93

+0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.69

1.32

+0.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.17

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

0.83

+0.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.23

2.53

+1.70

MDISX vs. SBLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDISX Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is comparable to the SBLGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDISX and SBLGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDISXSBLGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

0.93

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.50

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.71

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.48

+0.33

Drawdowns

MDISX vs. SBLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDISX drawdown since its inception was -40.15%, smaller than the maximum SBLGX drawdown of -53.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDISX and SBLGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDISXSBLGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.15%

-53.64%

+13.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.09%

-16.95%

+6.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.93%

-20.98%

+8.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.57%

-38.28%

+16.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.15%

-38.28%

-1.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.23%

-0.59%

-3.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.27%

-12.92%

+7.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

5.53%

-2.28%

Volatility

MDISX vs. SBLGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Fund (MDISX) is 3.23%, while ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund (SBLGX) has a volatility of 3.60%. This indicates that MDISX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDISXSBLGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.23%

3.60%

-0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.10%

11.52%

-2.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.85%

15.11%

-3.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.67%

21.15%

-5.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.11%

20.45%

-3.34%

MDISX vs. SBLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDISX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than SBLGX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

MDISX vs. SBLGX - Dividend Comparison

MDISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.40%, less than SBLGX's 11.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDISX
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Fund
10.40%10.55%12.84%7.12%10.29%8.75%3.50%7.21%7.50%2.97%4.13%7.77%
SBLGX
ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund
11.97%12.68%5.39%12.39%9.34%12.48%6.17%5.12%4.00%4.41%2.08%2.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDISX and SBLGX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SBLGX has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to MDISX (3.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDISX dropped -40.15% vs SBLGX's -53.64%.

MDISX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDISX and SBLGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer