PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDISX vs. GQFPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDISX vs. GQFPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Fund (MDISX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDISX achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly lower than GQFPX's 8.80% return.


MDISX

1D
-0.15%
1M
1.37%
YTD
1.50%
6M
3.70%
1Y
13.36%
3Y*
14.41%
5Y*
9.11%
10Y*
8.58%

GQFPX

1D
0.53%
1M
-2.50%
YTD
8.80%
6M
9.02%
1Y
15.73%
3Y*
14.73%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDISX vs. GQFPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MDISX
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Fund
1.50%23.75%6.38%20.48%-4.73%3.08%
GQFPX
GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund
8.80%19.29%4.81%15.09%-1.13%5.03%

Correlation

The correlation between MDISX and GQFPX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021

0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between MDISX and GQFPX has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDISX vs. GQFPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDISX
MDISX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
MDISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDISX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
MDISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDISX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

GQFPX
GQFPX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
GQFPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQFPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQFPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
GQFPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQFPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDISX vs. GQFPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Fund (MDISX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDISXGQFPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.29

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

2.99

-1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.23

8.58

-4.35

MDISX vs. GQFPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDISX Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is comparable to the GQFPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDISX and GQFPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDISXGQFPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

1.66

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.82

-0.01

Drawdowns

MDISX vs. GQFPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDISX drawdown since its inception was -40.15%, which is greater than GQFPX's maximum drawdown of -16.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDISX and GQFPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDISXGQFPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.15%

-16.95%

-23.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.09%

-5.24%

-4.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.93%

-10.57%

-2.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.23%

-3.93%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.27%

-3.00%

-2.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

1.82%

+1.43%

Volatility

MDISX vs. GQFPX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Fund (MDISX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX) have volatilities of 3.23% and 3.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDISXGQFPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.23%

3.24%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.10%

7.63%

+1.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.85%

9.47%

+2.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.67%

12.82%

+2.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.11%

12.82%

+4.29%

MDISX vs. GQFPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDISX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than GQFPX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

MDISX vs. GQFPX - Dividend Comparison

MDISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.40%, more than GQFPX's 5.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GQFPX
GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund
5.87%5.32%3.71%3.69%5.18%1.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MDISX
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Fund
10.40%10.55%12.84%7.12%10.29%8.75%3.50%7.21%7.50%2.97%4.13%7.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDISX and GQFPX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GQFPX has higher volatility (3.24%) compared to MDISX (3.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDISX dropped -40.15% vs GQFPX's -16.95%.

GQFPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDISX and GQFPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer