PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDIJX vs. EFA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDIJX vs. EFA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS International Diversification Fund (MDIJX) and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with MDIJX at 9.29% and EFA at 9.29%. Over the past 10 years, MDIJX has outperformed EFA with an annualized return of 9.81%, while EFA has yielded a comparatively lower 9.14% annualized return.


MDIJX

1D
-0.88%
1M
3.09%
YTD
9.29%
6M
10.89%
1Y
21.07%
3Y*
16.00%
5Y*
6.88%
10Y*
9.81%

EFA

1D
0.80%
1M
2.85%
YTD
9.29%
6M
11.52%
1Y
21.48%
3Y*
16.97%
5Y*
8.46%
10Y*
9.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDIJX vs. EFA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDIJX
MFS International Diversification Fund
9.29%27.84%6.41%14.37%-17.12%7.69%15.26%26.00%-11.05%30.29%
EFA
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
9.29%31.55%3.49%18.36%-14.39%11.45%7.60%22.04%-13.82%25.07%

Correlation

The correlation between MDIJX and EFA is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2004

0.93

The correlation between MDIJX and EFA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDIJX vs. EFA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDIJX
MDIJX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
MDIJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDIJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDIJX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
MDIJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDIJX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

EFA
EFA Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
EFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFA Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
EFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFA Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDIJX vs. EFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS International Diversification Fund (MDIJX) and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDIJXEFADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.26

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

1.89

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.27

7.08

+0.19

MDIJX vs. EFA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDIJX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the EFA Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDIJX and EFA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDIJXEFADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

1.43

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.52

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

0.53

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.31

+0.16

Drawdowns

MDIJX vs. EFA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDIJX drawdown since its inception was -56.60%, smaller than the maximum EFA drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDIJX and EFA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDIJXEFADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.60%

-61.04%

+4.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.40%

-11.42%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.57%

-14.05%

+1.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.19%

-29.53%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.19%

-34.19%

+4.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.88%

-0.67%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.09%

-11.93%

+2.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

3.04%

-0.03%

Volatility

MDIJX vs. EFA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS International Diversification Fund (MDIJX) is 4.09%, while iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) has a volatility of 4.88%. This indicates that MDIJX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDIJXEFADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.09%

4.88%

-0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.21%

12.53%

-2.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.51%

15.05%

-2.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.23%

16.48%

-2.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.70%

17.26%

-2.56%

MDIJX vs. EFA - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDIJX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than EFA's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

MDIJX vs. EFA - Dividend Comparison

MDIJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, more than EFA's 3.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFA
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
3.09%3.38%3.24%2.98%2.69%3.33%2.13%3.10%3.39%2.57%3.07%2.76%
MDIJX
MFS International Diversification Fund
4.73%5.17%3.50%4.14%2.64%2.70%1.64%2.50%3.14%1.63%2.18%1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDIJX and EFA have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EFA has higher volatility (4.88%) compared to MDIJX (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDIJX dropped -56.60% vs EFA's -61.04%.

MDIJX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDIJX and EFA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer