MDEV vs. XPH
MDEV (First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF) and XPH (SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - MDEV tracks the Indxx Global Medical Equipment Index while XPH tracks the S&P Pharmaceuticals Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MDEV returned -2.86%/yr vs 13.07%/yr for XPH. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MDEV charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XPH.
Performance
MDEV vs. XPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDEV achieves a -11.48% return, which is significantly lower than XPH's 0.66% return.
MDEV
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 1.54%
- YTD
- -11.48%
- 6M
- -12.29%
- 1Y
- -7.05%
- 3Y*
- -2.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XPH
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- -4.74%
- YTD
- 0.66%
- 6M
- 4.44%
- 1Y
- 37.98%
- 3Y*
- 13.07%
- 5Y*
- 3.50%
- 10Y*
- 3.44%
MDEV vs. XPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDEV First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF | -11.48% | 2.00% | 1.79% | 7.55% | -28.59% | 4.16% |
XPH SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF | 0.66% | 31.60% | 4.94% | 2.97% | -9.83% | -10.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDEV and XPH is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2021 | 0.63 |
The correlation between MDEV and XPH shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MDEV vs. XPH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MDEV
XPH
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
MDEV
XPH
Basic Materials
MDEV
-
XPH
-
Communication Services
MDEV
-
XPH
-
Consumer Cyclical
MDEV
-
XPH
-
Consumer Defensive
MDEV
-
XPH
-
Energy
MDEV
-
XPH
-
Financial Services
MDEV
-
XPH
-
Industrials
MDEV
-
XPH
-
Real Estate
MDEV
-
XPH
-
Technology
MDEV
-
XPH
-
Utilities
MDEV
-
XPH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDEV vs. XPH — Risk / Return Rank
MDEV
XPH
MDEV vs. XPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF (MDEV) and SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF (XPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MDEV | XPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.30 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | 3.19 | -3.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.98 | 11.37 | -12.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MDEV | XPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.44 | 1.77 | -2.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.32 | 0.38 | -0.70 |
Drawdowns
MDEV vs. XPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDEV drawdown since its inception was -42.34%, smaller than the maximum XPH drawdown of -48.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDEV and XPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDEV | XPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.34% | -48.03% | +5.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.13% | -11.97% | -6.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.50% | -23.57% | +1.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.76% | -7.22% | -26.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.65% | -17.25% | -8.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.22% | 3.35% | +3.87% |
Volatility
MDEV vs. XPH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF (MDEV) is 4.60%, while SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF (XPH) has a volatility of 7.03%. This indicates that MDEV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XPH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDEV | XPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.60% | 7.03% | -2.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.42% | 16.77% | -5.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.00% | 21.52% | -5.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.98% | 20.84% | -1.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.98% | 22.10% | -3.12% |
MDEV vs. XPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDEV has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than XPH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
MDEV vs. XPH - Dividend Comparison
MDEV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDEV First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XPH SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF | 0.66% | 0.83% | 1.58% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 0.95% | 0.47% | 0.64% | 0.65% | 0.67% | 0.63% | 7.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MDEV and XPH have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XPH has higher volatility (7.03%) compared to MDEV (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDEV dropped -42.34% vs XPH's -48.03%.
On 3-year performance, XPH leads with 13.07% vs -2.86% for MDEV. On fees, XPH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, MDEV has been the lower-risk option at 4.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, XPH has performed better with a 13.07% return vs -2.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XPH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for MDEV.
XPH has the higher dividend yield at 0.66%, compared with 0.00% for MDEV.
MDEV tracks Indxx Global Medical Equipment Index, while XPH tracks S&P Pharmaceuticals Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for MDEV and 0.35% for XPH.
XPH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDEV and XPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer