MDEV vs. XLV
MDEV (First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF) and XLV (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - MDEV tracks the Indxx Global Medical Equipment Index while XLV tracks the Health Care Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MDEV returned -2.86%/yr vs 5.98%/yr for XLV. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MDEV charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLV.
Performance
MDEV vs. XLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDEV achieves a -11.48% return, which is significantly lower than XLV's -4.29% return.
MDEV
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 1.54%
- YTD
- -11.48%
- 6M
- -12.29%
- 1Y
- -7.05%
- 3Y*
- -2.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLV
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 1.95%
- YTD
- -4.29%
- 6M
- -4.06%
- 1Y
- 12.89%
- 3Y*
- 5.98%
- 5Y*
- 5.55%
- 10Y*
- 9.20%
MDEV vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDEV First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF | -11.48% | 2.00% | 1.79% | 7.55% | -28.59% | 4.16% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | -4.29% | 14.50% | 2.47% | 2.07% | -2.08% | 14.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDEV and XLV is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2021 | 0.72 |
The correlation between MDEV and XLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
MDEV vs. XLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MDEV
XLV
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
MDEV
XLV
Basic Materials
MDEV
-
XLV
-
Communication Services
MDEV
-
XLV
-
Consumer Cyclical
MDEV
-
XLV
-
Consumer Defensive
MDEV
-
XLV
-
Energy
MDEV
-
XLV
-
Financial Services
MDEV
-
XLV
-
Industrials
MDEV
-
XLV
-
Real Estate
MDEV
-
XLV
-
Technology
MDEV
-
XLV
-
Utilities
MDEV
-
XLV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDEV vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank
MDEV
XLV
MDEV vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF (MDEV) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MDEV | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.16 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | 1.24 | -1.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.98 | 2.99 | -3.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MDEV | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.44 | 0.88 | -1.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.32 | 0.46 | -0.78 |
Drawdowns
MDEV vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDEV drawdown since its inception was -42.34%, which is greater than XLV's maximum drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDEV and XLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDEV | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.34% | -39.17% | -3.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.13% | -10.47% | -7.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.50% | -17.11% | -5.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.76% | -7.52% | -26.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.65% | -7.12% | -18.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.22% | 4.32% | +2.90% |
Volatility
MDEV vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF (MDEV) has a higher volatility of 4.60% compared to State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) at 4.10%. This indicates that MDEV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDEV | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.60% | 4.10% | +0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.42% | 10.24% | +1.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.00% | 14.67% | +1.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.98% | 14.69% | +4.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.98% | 16.55% | +2.43% |
MDEV vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDEV has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than XLV's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
MDEV vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison
MDEV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDEV First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.70% | 1.60% | 1.67% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 2.17% | 1.57% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MDEV and XLV have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MDEV has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to XLV (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDEV dropped -42.34% vs XLV's -39.17%.
On 3-year performance, XLV leads with 5.98% vs -2.86% for MDEV. On fees, XLV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLV has been the lower-risk option at 4.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, XLV has performed better with a 5.98% return vs -2.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for MDEV.
XLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 0.00% for MDEV.
MDEV tracks Indxx Global Medical Equipment Index, while XLV tracks Health Care Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for MDEV and 0.08% for XLV.
XLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDEV and XLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer