MDEV vs. PSIL
MDEV (First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF) and PSIL (AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. MDEV is passively managed, while PSIL is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, MDEV returned -2.86%/yr vs 9.55%/yr for PSIL. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MDEV charges 0.70%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for PSIL.
Performance
MDEV vs. PSIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDEV achieves a -11.48% return, which is significantly lower than PSIL's 20.15% return.
MDEV
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 1.54%
- YTD
- -11.48%
- 6M
- -12.29%
- 1Y
- -7.05%
- 3Y*
- -2.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSIL
- 1D
- -2.57%
- 1M
- 1.88%
- YTD
- 20.15%
- 6M
- 23.74%
- 1Y
- 65.52%
- 3Y*
- 9.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MDEV vs. PSIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDEV First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF | -11.48% | 2.00% | 1.79% | 7.55% | -28.59% | -5.14% |
PSIL AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF | 20.15% | 74.55% | -19.50% | -25.12% | -67.24% | -41.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDEV and PSIL is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2021 | 0.37 |
MDEV vs. PSIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MDEV
PSIL
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
MDEV
PSIL
Basic Materials
MDEV
-
PSIL
-
Communication Services
MDEV
-
PSIL
-
Consumer Cyclical
MDEV
-
PSIL
-
Consumer Defensive
MDEV
-
PSIL
-
Energy
MDEV
-
PSIL
-
Financial Services
MDEV
-
PSIL
-
Industrials
MDEV
-
PSIL
-
Real Estate
MDEV
-
PSIL
-
Technology
MDEV
-
PSIL
-
Utilities
MDEV
-
PSIL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDEV vs. PSIL — Risk / Return Rank
MDEV
PSIL
MDEV vs. PSIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF (MDEV) and AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF (PSIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MDEV | PSIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.27 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | 3.23 | -3.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.98 | 6.82 | -7.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MDEV | PSIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.44 | 1.58 | -2.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.32 | -0.42 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
MDEV vs. PSIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDEV drawdown since its inception was -42.34%, smaller than the maximum PSIL drawdown of -92.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDEV and PSIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDEV | PSIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.34% | -92.72% | +50.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.13% | -20.38% | +2.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.50% | -64.62% | +42.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.76% | -76.63% | +42.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.65% | -76.76% | +51.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.22% | 9.63% | -2.41% |
Volatility
MDEV vs. PSIL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF (MDEV) is 4.60%, while AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF (PSIL) has a volatility of 9.76%. This indicates that MDEV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDEV | PSIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.60% | 9.76% | -5.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.42% | 27.89% | -16.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.00% | 41.80% | -25.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.98% | 63.15% | -44.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.98% | 63.15% | -44.17% |
MDEV vs. PSIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDEV has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than PSIL's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
MDEV vs. PSIL - Dividend Comparison
MDEV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PSIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.32%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDEV First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSIL AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF | 8.32% | 10.95% | 1.49% | 0.24% | 2.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MDEV and PSIL have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSIL has higher volatility (9.76%) compared to MDEV (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDEV dropped -42.34% vs PSIL's -92.72%.
On 3-year performance, PSIL leads with 9.55% vs -2.86% for MDEV. On fees, MDEV is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, MDEV has been the lower-risk option at 4.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PSIL has performed better with a 9.55% return vs -2.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MDEV is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for PSIL.
PSIL has the higher dividend yield at 8.32%, compared with 0.00% for MDEV.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for MDEV and 1.00% for PSIL.
PSIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDEV and PSIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer