MDEV vs. PBPH
MDEV (First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF) and PBPH (Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - MDEV tracks the Indxx Global Medical Equipment Index while PBPH tracks the BITA Global Pharma and Biotech Select Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MDEV charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for PBPH.
Performance
MDEV vs. PBPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDEV achieves a -11.56% return, which is significantly lower than PBPH's 2.63% return.
MDEV
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- -1.40%
- YTD
- -11.56%
- 6M
- -12.11%
- 1Y
- -7.87%
- 3Y*
- -3.34%
- 5Y*
- -6.04%
- 10Y*
- —
PBPH
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 2.63%
- 6M
- 2.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MDEV vs. PBPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MDEV First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF | -11.56% | -0.72% |
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | 2.63% | 0.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDEV and PBPH is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025 | 0.51 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDEV vs. PBPH — Risk / Return Rank
MDEV
PBPH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MDEV vs. PBPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF (MDEV) and Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF (PBPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MDEV | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.44 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.00 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MDEV vs. PBPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDEV drawdown since its inception was -42.34%, which is greater than PBPH's maximum drawdown of -11.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDEV and PBPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDEV | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.34% | -11.10% | -31.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.81% | -5.21% | -28.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.71% | -4.36% | -21.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.87% | — | — |
Volatility
MDEV vs. PBPH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDEV | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.27% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.81% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.17% | 17.07% | -0.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.96% | 17.07% | +1.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.95% | 17.07% | +1.88% |
MDEV vs. PBPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDEV has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than PBPH's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
MDEV vs. PBPH - Dividend Comparison
MDEV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PBPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MDEV First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | 0.09% | 0.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MDEV and PBPH have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBPH is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBPH is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for MDEV.
PBPH has the higher dividend yield at 0.09%, compared with 0.00% for MDEV.
MDEV tracks Indxx Global Medical Equipment Index, while PBPH tracks BITA Global Pharma and Biotech Select Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Portfolio Building Block. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for MDEV and 0.13% for PBPH.
Find the right allocation for MDEV and PBPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer