MDAA vs. RULE
Compare and contrast key facts about Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF (MDAA) and Adaptive Core ETF (RULE).
MDAA and RULE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MDAA is an actively managed fund by Myriad. It was launched on Oct 3, 2025. RULE is an actively managed fund by Mohr Funds. It was launched on Nov 2, 2021.
Performance
MDAA vs. RULE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MDAA vs. RULE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MDAA Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF | 1.51% | -0.27% |
RULE Adaptive Core ETF | 5.57% | -0.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDAA achieves a 1.51% return, which is significantly lower than RULE's 5.57% return.
MDAA
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- -8.03%
- YTD
- 1.51%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RULE
- 1D
- 2.49%
- 1M
- -6.00%
- YTD
- 5.57%
- 6M
- 5.32%
- 1Y
- 16.97%
- 3Y*
- 8.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MDAA vs. RULE - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDAA has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than RULE's 1.10% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MDAA vs. RULE — Risk / Return Rank
MDAA
RULE
MDAA vs. RULE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF (MDAA) and Adaptive Core ETF (RULE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MDAA | RULE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | -0.03 | +0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between MDAA and RULE is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MDAA vs. RULE - Dividend Comparison
MDAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, while RULE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDAA Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF | 0.45% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RULE Adaptive Core ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.01% | 0.01% |
Drawdowns
MDAA vs. RULE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDAA drawdown since its inception was -14.59%, smaller than the maximum RULE drawdown of -30.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDAA and RULE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDAA | RULE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.59% | -30.48% | +15.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.23% | -7.15% | -3.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.16% | -15.50% | +12.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.24% | — |
Volatility
MDAA vs. RULE - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MDAA | RULE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.24% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.26% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.28% | 19.40% | +2.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.28% | 13.94% | +8.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.28% | 13.94% | +8.34% |