MDAA vs. PCEF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MDAA (Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF) and PCEF (Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. MDAA is actively managed, while PCEF is passively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MDAA charges 0.97%/yr vs 2.71%/yr for PCEF.

Performance

MDAA vs. PCEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF (MDAA) and Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF (PCEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDAA achieves a 22.13% return, which is significantly higher than PCEF's 4.88% return.

MDAA

• 1D: -1.11%
• 1M: 8.24%
• YTD: 22.13%
• 6M: 22.52%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PCEF

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: 2.15%
• YTD: 4.88%
• 6M: 5.42%
• 1Y: 14.12%
• 3Y*: 13.61%
• 5Y*: 4.82%
• 10Y*: 7.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDAA vs. PCEF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MDAA Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF	22.13%	-0.27%
PCEF Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF	4.88%	1.35%

Correlation

The correlation between MDAA and PCEF is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2025	0.77

Return for Risk

MDAA vs. PCEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCEF

PCEF Risk / Return Rank: 45
PCEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
PCEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
PCEF Omega Ratio Rank: 49
PCEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
PCEF Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDAA vs. PCEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF (MDAA) and Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF (PCEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MDAA	PCEF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.65	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.42	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.55	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.47	0.57	+0.89

Drawdowns

MDAA vs. PCEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDAA drawdown since its inception was -14.59%, smaller than the maximum PCEF drawdown of -38.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDAA and PCEF.

Drawdown Indicators

	MDAA	PCEF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.59%	-38.64%	+24.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.30%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.09%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.25%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.11%	-0.74%	-0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.93%	-4.47%	+1.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.77%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MDAA	PCEF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.50%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.30%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.89%	8.61%	+15.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.89%	11.48%	+12.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.89%	13.29%	+10.60%

MDAA vs. PCEF - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDAA has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than PCEF's 2.71% expense ratio.

Dividends

MDAA vs. PCEF - Dividend Comparison

MDAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than PCEF's 7.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MDAA Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF	0.38%	0.46%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PCEF Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF	7.73%	7.96%	8.79%	9.86%	8.93%	6.67%	7.54%	7.12%	8.21%	6.96%	7.72%	9.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MDAA and PCEF in my portfolio?

MDAA and PCEF have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MDAA or PCEF?

On fees, MDAA is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MDAA or PCEF?

MDAA is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 2.71% for PCEF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MDAA or PCEF?

PCEF has the higher dividend yield at 7.73%, compared with 0.38% for MDAA.

What is the main difference between MDAA and PCEF?

They also come from different issuers: Myriad and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for MDAA and 2.71% for PCEF.