PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDAA vs. MFUL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDAA vs. MFUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF (MDAA) and Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDAA achieves a 22.13% return, which is significantly higher than MFUL's 3.28% return.


MDAA

1D
-1.11%
1M
8.24%
YTD
22.13%
6M
22.52%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MFUL

1D
-0.28%
1M
1.45%
YTD
3.28%
6M
3.33%
1Y
7.13%
3Y*
4.96%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDAA vs. MFUL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MDAA
Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF
22.13%-0.27%
MFUL
Mindful Conservative ETF
3.28%-0.13%

Correlation

The correlation between MDAA and MFUL is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2025

0.85

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDAA vs. MFUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDAA

MFUL
MFUL Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
MFUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFUL Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
MFUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFUL Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDAA vs. MFUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF (MDAA) and Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MDAA vs. MFUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDAAMFULDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.47

0.01

+1.46

Drawdowns

MDAA vs. MFUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDAA drawdown since its inception was -14.59%, smaller than the maximum MFUL drawdown of -16.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDAA and MFUL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDAAMFULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.59%

-16.41%

+1.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-0.46%

-0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.93%

-9.50%

+6.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

Volatility

MDAA vs. MFUL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDAAMFULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.89%

3.93%

+19.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.89%

4.24%

+19.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.89%

4.24%

+19.65%

MDAA vs. MFUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDAA has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than MFUL's 1.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

MDAA vs. MFUL - Dividend Comparison

MDAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than MFUL's 3.01% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
MDAA
Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF
0.38%0.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MFUL
Mindful Conservative ETF
3.01%3.31%2.59%5.00%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


MDAA and MFUL have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MDAA is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MDAA is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for MFUL.

MFUL has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 0.38% for MDAA.

They also come from different issuers: Myriad and Mohr Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for MDAA and 1.10% for MFUL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDAA and MFUL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer