PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCW vs. QQQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MCW vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mister Car Wash, Inc. (MCW) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCW achieves a 27.70% return, which is significantly higher than QQQM's 20.73% return.


MCW

1D
0.00%
1M
0.71%
YTD
27.70%
6M
35.24%
1Y
7.09%
3Y*
-6.48%
5Y*
10Y*

QQQM

1D
-0.54%
1M
8.67%
YTD
20.73%
6M
19.22%
1Y
40.83%
3Y*
28.64%
5Y*
17.94%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCW vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MCW
Mister Car Wash, Inc.
27.70%-23.73%-15.62%-6.39%-49.31%-10.30%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
20.73%20.85%25.68%55.01%-32.52%14.11%

Correlation

The correlation between MCW and QQQM is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2021

0.38

Over the past year, the correlation between MCW and QQQM has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.38, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MCW vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCW
MCW Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
MCW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCW Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
MCW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCW Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQM
QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCW vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mister Car Wash, Inc. (MCW) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MCWQQQMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.44

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.17

3.43

-3.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.30

13.15

-13.45

MCW vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCW Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is lower than the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCW and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MCWQQQMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

2.58

-2.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.43

0.84

-1.28

Drawdowns

MCW vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCW drawdown since its inception was -80.11%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCW and QQQM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MCWQQQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.11%

-35.04%

-45.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.38%

-11.96%

-19.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.11%

-22.70%

-30.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-69.83%

-0.75%

-69.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.53%

-8.24%

-51.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.90%

3.11%

+18.79%

Volatility

MCW vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mister Car Wash, Inc. (MCW) is 1.39%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 4.51%. This indicates that MCW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MCWQQQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.39%

4.51%

-3.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.93%

12.06%

+10.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.58%

15.91%

+19.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.58%

22.23%

+22.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.58%

22.11%

+22.47%

Dividends

MCW vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

MCW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
MCW
Mister Car Wash, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.42%0.50%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


MCW and QQQM have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQM has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to MCW (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCW dropped -80.11% vs QQQM's -35.04%.

QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCW and QQQM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer