PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCVIX vs. FVCSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MCVIX vs. FVCSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (MCVIX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C (FVCSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCVIX achieves a 15.23% return, which is significantly lower than FVCSX's 28.24% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MCVIX having a 10.39% annualized return and FVCSX not far behind at 10.34%.


MCVIX

1D
-0.44%
1M
1.47%
6M
10.99%
YTD
15.23%
1Y
21.45%
3Y*
12.89%
5Y*
9.43%
10Y*
10.39%
ALL TIME*
9.96%

FVCSX

1D
-0.10%
1M
1.97%
6M
18.57%
YTD
28.24%
1Y
42.56%
3Y*
10.30%
5Y*
8.61%
10Y*
10.34%
ALL TIME*
6.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MCVIX vs. FVCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MCVIX
MFS Mid Cap Value Fund Class I
15.23%6.33%13.88%12.80%-8.74%30.79%4.27%30.87%-11.48%13.67%
FVCSX
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C
28.24%7.23%-6.69%19.32%-8.35%31.94%7.10%33.09%-17.58%16.92%

Correlation

The correlation between MCVIX and FVCSX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2001

0.95

The correlation between MCVIX and FVCSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MCVIX vs. FVCSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MCVIX
MCVIX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
MCVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
MCVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

FVCSX
FVCSX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FVCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FVCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MCVIX vs. FVCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (MCVIX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C (FVCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MCVIXFVCSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.39

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

3.93

-1.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.27

15.12

-7.84

MCVIX vs. FVCSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCVIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the FVCSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCVIX and FVCSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MCVIX vs. FVCSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCVIX drawdown since its inception was -59.64%, smaller than the maximum FVCSX drawdown of -70.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCVIX and FVCSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MCVIXFVCSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.64%

-70.38%

+10.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.38%

-9.89%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.01%

-37.07%

+16.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.01%

-37.07%

+16.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.79%

-48.07%

+5.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.37%

-0.94%

-0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.84%

-11.14%

+3.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

2.58%

+0.11%

Volatility

MCVIX vs. FVCSX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (MCVIX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C (FVCSX) have volatilities of 3.33% and 3.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MCVIXFVCSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

3.27%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.71%

11.74%

-2.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.42%

17.02%

-3.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.15%

20.97%

-3.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.18%

22.13%

-2.95%

MCVIX vs. FVCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCVIX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than FVCSX's 1.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

MCVIX vs. FVCSX - Dividend Comparison

MCVIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.08%, less than FVCSX's 10.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FVCSX
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C
10.20%13.08%0.00%2.96%2.23%9.80%0.33%5.50%18.83%8.78%25.66%0.43%
MCVIX
MFS Mid Cap Value Fund Class I
7.08%8.16%10.88%2.88%5.32%5.78%0.99%2.20%6.49%3.53%0.06%4.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, MCVIX and FVCSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MCVIX has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to FVCSX (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCVIX dropped -59.64% vs FVCSX's -70.38%.

FVCSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCVIX and FVCSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer