PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCVIX vs. FSMDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MCVIX vs. FSMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (MCVIX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCVIX achieves a 12.76% return, which is significantly lower than FSMDX's 15.11% return. Over the past 10 years, MCVIX has underperformed FSMDX with an annualized return of 10.49%, while FSMDX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.89% annualized return.


MCVIX

1D
-0.17%
1M
3.47%
6M
12.76%
YTD
12.76%
1Y
16.80%
3Y*
13.23%
5Y*
8.89%
10Y*
10.49%

FSMDX

1D
-0.16%
1M
2.06%
6M
15.11%
YTD
15.11%
1Y
19.91%
3Y*
16.51%
5Y*
8.34%
10Y*
11.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCVIX vs. FSMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MCVIX
MFS Mid Cap Value Fund Class I
12.76%6.33%13.88%12.80%-8.74%30.79%4.27%30.87%-11.48%13.67%
FSMDX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund
15.11%10.58%15.55%17.20%-17.27%22.56%17.13%30.53%-9.38%18.04%

Correlation

The correlation between MCVIX and FSMDX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011

0.95

The correlation between MCVIX and FSMDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MCVIX vs. FSMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCVIX
MCVIX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
MCVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
MCVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

FSMDX
FSMDX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
FSMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCVIX vs. FSMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (MCVIX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MCVIXFSMDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.26

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

2.53

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.45

9.68

-3.24

MCVIX vs. FSMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCVIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the FSMDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCVIX and FSMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MCVIX vs. FSMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCVIX drawdown since its inception was -59.64%, which is greater than FSMDX's maximum drawdown of -40.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCVIX and FSMDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MCVIXFSMDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.64%

-40.35%

-19.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.38%

-8.16%

-1.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.01%

-20.92%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.01%

-26.07%

+5.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.79%

-40.35%

-2.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-0.16%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.87%

-4.93%

-2.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

2.13%

+0.60%

Volatility

MCVIX vs. FSMDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (MCVIX) is 3.86%, while Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX) has a volatility of 4.72%. This indicates that MCVIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MCVIXFSMDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.86%

4.72%

-0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.95%

10.57%

-0.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.53%

13.84%

-0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.23%

18.33%

-1.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.18%

19.28%

-0.10%

MCVIX vs. FSMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCVIX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMDX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

MCVIX vs. FSMDX - Dividend Comparison

MCVIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.24%, more than FSMDX's 0.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSMDX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund
0.76%1.10%2.46%1.39%2.07%3.35%2.34%2.86%2.21%2.17%2.23%2.84%
MCVIX
MFS Mid Cap Value Fund Class I
7.24%8.16%10.88%2.88%5.32%5.78%0.99%2.20%6.49%3.53%0.06%4.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, MCVIX and FSMDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSMDX has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to MCVIX (3.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCVIX dropped -59.64% vs FSMDX's -40.35%.

FSMDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCVIX and FSMDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer