PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCSRX vs. MIGFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MCSRX vs. MIGFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSRX) and MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund (MIGFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCSRX achieves a 15.51% return, which is significantly higher than MIGFX's -4.19% return. Over the past 10 years, MCSRX has underperformed MIGFX with an annualized return of 6.59%, while MIGFX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.60% annualized return.


MCSRX

1D
-0.71%
1M
-7.33%
YTD
15.51%
6M
13.93%
1Y
25.03%
3Y*
13.39%
5Y*
10.48%
10Y*
6.59%

MIGFX

1D
-1.19%
1M
-1.87%
YTD
-4.19%
6M
-4.92%
1Y
5.07%
3Y*
13.54%
5Y*
8.88%
10Y*
14.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCSRX vs. MIGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MCSRX
MFS Commodity Strategy Fund
15.51%18.63%5.18%-6.07%13.19%27.96%-0.36%7.80%-12.77%3.83%
MIGFX
MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund
-4.19%9.97%27.25%24.13%-19.20%26.06%22.55%39.89%0.81%28.68%

Correlation

The correlation between MCSRX and MIGFX is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.17

The correlation between MCSRX and MIGFX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MCSRX vs. MIGFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCSRX
MCSRX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
MCSRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCSRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCSRX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
MCSRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCSRX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

MIGFX
MIGFX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
MIGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
MIGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCSRX vs. MIGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSRX) and MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund (MIGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MCSRXMIGFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.09

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

0.45

+1.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.78

1.45

+7.33

MCSRX vs. MIGFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCSRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is higher than the MIGFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCSRX and MIGFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MCSRX vs. MIGFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCSRX drawdown since its inception was -72.07%, which is greater than MIGFX's maximum drawdown of -61.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCSRX and MIGFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MCSRXMIGFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.07%

-61.83%

-10.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.13%

-13.77%

+3.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.13%

-18.68%

+8.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.76%

-26.67%

-11.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.07%

-32.42%

-39.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.72%

-6.18%

-17.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.77%

-18.94%

-22.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

4.27%

-1.39%

Volatility

MCSRX vs. MIGFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSRX) is 3.61%, while MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund (MIGFX) has a volatility of 4.89%. This indicates that MCSRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MIGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MCSRXMIGFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.61%

4.89%

-1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.81%

10.69%

+3.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.06%

13.21%

+2.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.75%

17.61%

+17.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.92%

18.26%

+41.66%

MCSRX vs. MIGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCSRX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than MIGFX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

MCSRX vs. MIGFX - Dividend Comparison

MCSRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.00%, more than MIGFX's 11.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MCSRX
MFS Commodity Strategy Fund
14.00%16.18%3.39%2.30%27.57%56.15%0.91%1.88%3.50%3.13%0.61%0.47%
MIGFX
MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund
11.89%11.39%17.15%4.11%4.49%10.47%7.43%7.39%10.76%6.87%5.12%6.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


MCSRX and MIGFX have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MIGFX has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to MCSRX (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCSRX dropped -72.07% vs MIGFX's -61.83%.

MCSRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCSRX and MIGFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer