MCSIX vs. MIGFX
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSIX) and MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund (MIGFX).
MCSIX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Jun 1, 2010. MIGFX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Jan 1, 1935.
Performance
MCSIX vs. MIGFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MCSIX vs. MIGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCSIX MFS Commodity Strategy Fund | 20.44% | 18.47% | 5.08% | -6.13% | 13.40% | 27.55% | -0.02% | 7.79% | -12.79% | 3.65% |
MIGFX MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund | -11.94% | 9.97% | 27.25% | 24.13% | -19.20% | 26.06% | 22.55% | 39.89% | 0.81% | 28.68% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCSIX achieves a 20.44% return, which is significantly higher than MIGFX's -11.94% return. Over the past 10 years, MCSIX has underperformed MIGFX with an annualized return of 8.18%, while MIGFX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.37% annualized return.
MCSIX
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 7.13%
- YTD
- 20.44%
- 6M
- 27.27%
- 1Y
- 30.89%
- 3Y*
- 13.89%
- 5Y*
- 13.85%
- 10Y*
- 8.18%
MIGFX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -9.05%
- YTD
- -11.94%
- 6M
- -10.77%
- 1Y
- 2.07%
- 3Y*
- 12.38%
- 5Y*
- 8.52%
- 10Y*
- 13.37%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MCSIX vs. MIGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MCSIX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than MIGFX's 0.70% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MCSIX vs. MIGFX — Risk / Return Rank
MCSIX
MIGFX
MCSIX vs. MIGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSIX) and MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund (MIGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MCSIX | MIGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.90 | 0.14 | +1.76 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.41 | 0.33 | +2.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.05 | +0.31 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | 0.04 | +3.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.88 | 0.14 | +9.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MCSIX | MIGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | 0.14 | +1.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.49 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.74 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.38 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between MCSIX and MIGFX is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MCSIX vs. MIGFX - Dividend Comparison
MCSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.32%, more than MIGFX's 12.93% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCSIX MFS Commodity Strategy Fund | 13.32% | 16.04% | 3.30% | 2.21% | 27.42% | 56.01% | 0.88% | 1.87% | 3.50% | 3.14% | 0.61% | 0.47% |
MIGFX MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund | 12.93% | 11.39% | 17.15% | 4.11% | 4.49% | 10.47% | 7.43% | 7.39% | 10.76% | 6.87% | 5.12% | 6.51% |
Drawdowns
MCSIX vs. MIGFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCSIX drawdown since its inception was -64.20%, roughly equal to the maximum MIGFX drawdown of -61.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCSIX and MIGFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCSIX | MIGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.20% | -61.83% | -2.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.74% | -13.77% | +4.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.61% | -26.67% | -10.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.61% | -32.42% | -5.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.58% | -13.77% | +12.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.63% | -19.00% | -14.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.23% | 3.77% | -0.54% |
Volatility
MCSIX vs. MIGFX - Volatility Comparison
MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSIX) has a higher volatility of 6.29% compared to MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund (MIGFX) at 4.36%. This indicates that MCSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MIGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MCSIX | MIGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.29% | 4.36% | +1.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.48% | 9.37% | +4.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.72% | 17.64% | -0.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.64% | 17.45% | +17.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.03% | 18.16% | +7.87% |