MCSIX vs. GCCIX
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSIX) and Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX).
MCSIX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Jun 1, 2010. GCCIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Mar 29, 2007.
Performance
MCSIX vs. GCCIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MCSIX vs. GCCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCSIX MFS Commodity Strategy Fund | 20.44% | 18.47% | 5.08% | -6.13% | 13.40% | 27.55% | -0.02% | 7.79% | -12.79% | 3.65% |
GCCIX Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund | 14.84% | 15.45% | 5.92% | -9.65% | 15.70% | 33.42% | -23.01% | 16.75% | -14.89% | 4.31% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCSIX achieves a 20.44% return, which is significantly higher than GCCIX's 14.84% return. Over the past 10 years, MCSIX has outperformed GCCIX with an annualized return of 8.18%, while GCCIX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.23% annualized return.
MCSIX
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 7.13%
- YTD
- 20.44%
- 6M
- 27.27%
- 1Y
- 30.89%
- 3Y*
- 13.89%
- 5Y*
- 13.85%
- 10Y*
- 8.18%
GCCIX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 6.13%
- YTD
- 14.84%
- 6M
- 21.12%
- 1Y
- 21.37%
- 3Y*
- 10.90%
- 5Y*
- 12.25%
- 10Y*
- 6.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MCSIX vs. GCCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MCSIX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than GCCIX's 0.59% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MCSIX vs. GCCIX — Risk / Return Rank
MCSIX
GCCIX
MCSIX vs. GCCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSIX) and Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MCSIX | GCCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.90 | 1.47 | +0.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.41 | 1.93 | +0.49 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.27 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | 2.41 | +0.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.88 | 6.70 | +3.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MCSIX | GCCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | 1.47 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.67 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.31 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | -0.16 | +0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between MCSIX and GCCIX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MCSIX vs. GCCIX - Dividend Comparison
MCSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.32%, less than GCCIX's 14.01% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCSIX MFS Commodity Strategy Fund | 13.32% | 16.04% | 3.30% | 2.21% | 27.42% | 56.01% | 0.88% | 1.87% | 3.50% | 3.14% | 0.61% | 0.47% |
GCCIX Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund | 14.01% | 16.09% | 4.08% | 4.20% | 10.41% | 16.46% | 0.36% | 10.81% | 1.47% | 5.88% | 0.84% | 0.36% |
Drawdowns
MCSIX vs. GCCIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCSIX drawdown since its inception was -64.20%, smaller than the maximum GCCIX drawdown of -90.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCSIX and GCCIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCSIX | GCCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.20% | -90.80% | +26.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.74% | -9.39% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.61% | -28.78% | -8.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.61% | -57.76% | +20.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.58% | -71.54% | +69.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.63% | -69.41% | +35.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.23% | 3.37% | -0.14% |
Volatility
MCSIX vs. GCCIX - Volatility Comparison
MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSIX) has a higher volatility of 6.29% compared to Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX) at 5.50%. This indicates that MCSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MCSIX | GCCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.29% | 5.50% | +0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.48% | 11.68% | +1.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.72% | 15.20% | +1.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.64% | 18.45% | +16.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.03% | 20.14% | +5.89% |