MCSIX vs. GCCIX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MCSIX (MFS Commodity Strategy Fund) and GCCIX (Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund) are both Commodities funds. Over the past 10 years, MCSIX returned 6.56%/yr vs 4.56%/yr for GCCIX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MCSIX charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for GCCIX.

Performance

MCSIX vs. GCCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSIX) and Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCSIX achieves a 15.47% return, which is significantly higher than GCCIX's 11.22% return. Over the past 10 years, MCSIX has outperformed GCCIX with an annualized return of 6.56%, while GCCIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.56% annualized return.

MCSIX

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: -7.32%
• YTD: 15.47%
• 6M: 13.90%
• 1Y: 25.16%
• 3Y*: 13.36%
• 5Y*: 10.41%
• 10Y*: 6.56%

GCCIX

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: -6.96%
• YTD: 11.22%
• 6M: 9.97%
• 1Y: 18.20%
• 3Y*: 10.95%
• 5Y*: 9.21%
• 10Y*: 4.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCSIX vs. GCCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MCSIX MFS Commodity Strategy Fund	15.47%	18.47%	5.08%	-6.13%	13.40%	27.55%	-0.02%	7.79%	-12.79%	3.65%
GCCIX Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund	11.22%	15.45%	5.92%	-9.65%	15.70%	33.42%	-23.01%	16.75%	-14.89%	4.31%

Correlation

The correlation between MCSIX and GCCIX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2010	0.86

The correlation between MCSIX and GCCIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.86 (all time) to 0.96 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MCSIX vs. GCCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCSIX

MCSIX Risk / Return Rank: 35
MCSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
MCSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
MCSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 31
MCSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
MCSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 43

GCCIX

GCCIX Risk / Return Rank: 21
GCCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
GCCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
GCCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 19
GCCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
GCCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCSIX vs. GCCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSIX) and Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MCSIX	GCCIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.48	1.16	+0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	1.57	+0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.21	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.34	1.67	+0.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.72	5.93	+2.78

MCSIX vs. GCCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the GCCIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCSIX and GCCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MCSIX vs. GCCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCSIX drawdown since its inception was -64.20%, smaller than the maximum GCCIX drawdown of -90.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCSIX and GCCIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MCSIX	GCCIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.20%	-90.80%	+26.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.11%	-9.96%	-0.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.11%	-11.89%	+1.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.61%	-28.78%	-8.83%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.61%	-57.76%	+20.15%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.11%	-72.44%	+62.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.19%	-69.42%	+36.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.89%	3.25%	-0.36%

Volatility

MCSIX vs. GCCIX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSIX) has a higher volatility of 3.60% compared to Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX) at 3.31%. This indicates that MCSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MCSIX	GCCIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.60%	3.31%	+0.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.75%	12.28%	+1.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.02%	14.43%	+1.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.63%	18.46%	+16.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.03%	19.98%	+6.05%

MCSIX vs. GCCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCSIX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than GCCIX's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

MCSIX vs. GCCIX - Dividend Comparison

MCSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.89%, less than GCCIX's 14.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GCCIX Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund	14.46%	16.09%	4.08%	4.20%	10.41%	16.46%	0.36%	10.81%	1.47%	5.88%	0.84%	0.36%
MCSIX MFS Commodity Strategy Fund	13.89%	16.04%	3.30%	2.21%	27.42%	56.01%	0.88%	1.87%	3.50%	3.14%	0.61%	0.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MCSIX and GCCIX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, MCSIX and GCCIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MCSIX or GCCIX?

MCSIX has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to GCCIX (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCSIX dropped -64.20% vs GCCIX's -90.80%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MCSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.