MCSE vs. VXUS
MCSE (Martin Currie Sustainable International Equity ETF) and VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MCSE is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Martin Currie, while VXUS is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. MCSE is actively managed, while VXUS is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MCSE returned -0.32%/yr vs 19.30%/yr for VXUS. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MCSE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VXUS.
Performance
MCSE vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCSE achieves a 1.12% return, which is significantly lower than VXUS's 14.25% return.
MCSE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 1.12%
- 6M
- 0.84%
- 1Y
- 2.20%
- 3Y*
- -0.32%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VXUS
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 4.68%
- YTD
- 14.25%
- 6M
- 16.92%
- 1Y
- 32.01%
- 3Y*
- 19.30%
- 5Y*
- 8.46%
- 10Y*
- 9.76%
MCSE vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCSE Martin Currie Sustainable International Equity ETF | 1.12% | 7.79% | -9.46% | 14.86% | 11.00% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 14.25% | 32.35% | 5.08% | 15.86% | 10.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between MCSE and VXUS is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2022 | 0.76 |
The correlation between MCSE and VXUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MCSE vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MCSE
VXUS
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Financial Services
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
MCSE
VXUS
Healthcare
MCSE
VXUS
Industrials
MCSE
VXUS
Consumer Cyclical
MCSE
VXUS
Basic Materials
MCSE
VXUS
Consumer Defensive
MCSE
VXUS
Communication Services
MCSE
VXUS
Financial Services
MCSE
VXUS
Energy
MCSE
-
VXUS
Real Estate
MCSE
-
VXUS
Utilities
MCSE
-
VXUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MCSE vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank
MCSE
VXUS
MCSE vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Martin Currie Sustainable International Equity ETF (MCSE) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MCSE | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.39 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.23 | 2.85 | -2.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.56 | 11.14 | -10.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MCSE | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 | 2.12 | -1.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.39 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
MCSE vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCSE drawdown since its inception was -26.36%, smaller than the maximum VXUS drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCSE and VXUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCSE | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.36% | -35.97% | +9.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.42% | -11.27% | +0.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.36% | -13.58% | -12.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.51% | -0.99% | -9.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.73% | -8.22% | -0.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.10% | 2.88% | +1.22% |
Volatility
MCSE vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Martin Currie Sustainable International Equity ETF (MCSE) is 0.00%, while Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a volatility of 5.60%. This indicates that MCSE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MCSE | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 5.60% | -5.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.17% | 13.00% | -6.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.39% | 15.21% | -2.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.52% | 16.05% | +3.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.52% | 17.16% | +2.36% |
MCSE vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
MCSE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
MCSE vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison
MCSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, more than VXUS's 2.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCSE Martin Currie Sustainable International Equity ETF | 3.74% | 3.78% | 0.63% | 0.57% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 2.66% | 3.18% | 3.37% | 3.24% | 3.09% | 3.10% | 2.14% | 3.06% | 3.18% | 2.73% | 2.93% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MCSE and VXUS have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VXUS has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to MCSE (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCSE dropped -26.36% vs VXUS's -35.97%.
On 3-year performance, VXUS leads with 19.30% vs -0.32% for MCSE. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MCSE has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VXUS has performed better with a 19.30% return vs -0.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for MCSE.
MCSE has the higher dividend yield at 3.74%, compared with 2.66% for VXUS.
MCSE is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while VXUS is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Martin Currie and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MCSE and 0.05% for VXUS.
VXUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MCSE and VXUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer