PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCSE vs. BUFI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MCSE vs. BUFI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Martin Currie Sustainable International Equity ETF (MCSE) and AB International Buffer ETF (BUFI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCSE achieves a 1.12% return, which is significantly lower than BUFI's 5.24% return.


MCSE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
1.12%
6M
1.26%
1Y
0.77%
3Y*
-0.18%
5Y*
10Y*

BUFI

1D
0.30%
1M
1.60%
YTD
5.24%
6M
6.51%
1Y
12.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCSE vs. BUFI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MCSE
Martin Currie Sustainable International Equity ETF
1.12%7.79%-4.90%
BUFI
AB International Buffer ETF
5.24%16.50%-1.31%

Correlation

The correlation between MCSE and BUFI is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2024

0.65

The correlation between MCSE and BUFI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MCSE vs. BUFI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCSE
MCSE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
MCSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCSE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
MCSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCSE Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFI
BUFI Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
BUFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFI Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFI Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCSE vs. BUFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Martin Currie Sustainable International Equity ETF (MCSE) and AB International Buffer ETF (BUFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MCSEBUFIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.29

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.08

2.24

-2.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.20

8.92

-8.72

MCSE vs. BUFI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCSE Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is lower than the BUFI Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCSE and BUFI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MCSEBUFIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

1.52

-1.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

1.52

-1.17

Drawdowns

MCSE vs. BUFI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCSE drawdown since its inception was -26.36%, which is greater than BUFI's maximum drawdown of -7.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCSE and BUFI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MCSEBUFIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.36%

-7.43%

-18.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.42%

-5.69%

-4.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.51%

-0.02%

-10.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.73%

-0.85%

-7.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.11%

1.43%

+2.68%

Volatility

MCSE vs. BUFI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Martin Currie Sustainable International Equity ETF (MCSE) is 0.00%, while AB International Buffer ETF (BUFI) has a volatility of 2.16%. This indicates that MCSE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MCSEBUFIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

2.16%

-2.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.14%

7.05%

-0.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.39%

8.43%

+3.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.50%

9.14%

+10.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.50%

9.14%

+10.36%

MCSE vs. BUFI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCSE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFI's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

MCSE vs. BUFI - Dividend Comparison

MCSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, while BUFI has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BUFI
AB International Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MCSE
Martin Currie Sustainable International Equity ETF
3.74%3.78%0.63%0.57%0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


MCSE and BUFI have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BUFI has higher volatility (2.16%) compared to MCSE (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCSE dropped -26.36% vs BUFI's -7.43%.

On 1-year performance, BUFI leads with 12.71% vs 0.77% for MCSE. On fees, MCSE is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, MCSE has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BUFI has performed better with a 12.71% return vs 0.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MCSE is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for BUFI.

MCSE has the higher dividend yield at 3.74%, compared with 0.00% for BUFI.

MCSE is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while BUFI is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Martin Currie and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MCSE and 0.69% for BUFI.

BUFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCSE and BUFI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer