MCOW vs. ROE
MCOW (Pacer S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF) and ROE (Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF) are both Quality Factor funds. MCOW is passively managed, while ROE is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. Both charge a 0.49% expense ratio.
Performance
MCOW vs. ROE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCOW achieves a 8.57% return, which is significantly lower than ROE's 20.35% return.
MCOW
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- 6M
- 7.96%
- YTD
- 8.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
ROE
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- 6M
- 16.21%
- YTD
- 20.35%
- 1Y
- 33.36%
- 3Y*
- 20.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 20.32%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.40K | $63.77K | $46.18K | |
| $1.20M | $1.18M | $910.23K |
MCOW vs. ROE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MCOW Pacer S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF | 8.57% | -3.62% |
ROE Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF | 20.35% | 6.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between MCOW and ROE is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2025 | 0.81 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MCOW vs. ROE — Risk / Return Rank
MCOW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ROE
MCOW vs. ROE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (MCOW) and Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MCOW | ROE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.37 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.72 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.82 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MCOW vs. ROE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCOW drawdown since its inception was -15.02%, smaller than the maximum ROE drawdown of -19.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCOW and ROE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCOW | ROE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.02% | -19.10% | +4.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.87% | -1.30% | -0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.19% | -2.54% | -1.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.03% | — |
Volatility
MCOW vs. ROE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MCOW | ROE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.59% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.81% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.51% | 15.07% | +2.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.51% | 15.87% | +1.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.51% | 15.87% | +1.64% |
MCOW vs. ROE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MCOW and ROE have an expense ratio of 0.49%.
Dividends
MCOW vs. ROE - Dividend Comparison
MCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than ROE's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MCOW Pacer S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF | 0.21% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROE Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF | 1.01% | 0.97% | 1.18% | 0.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MCOW and ROE have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MCOW and ROE have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.
ROE has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.21% for MCOW.
They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Astoria.
Find the right allocation for MCOW and ROE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer