MCOW vs. GRNJ
MCOW (Pacer S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF) and GRNJ (Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. MCOW is passively managed, while GRNJ is actively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MCOW charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GRNJ.
Performance
MCOW vs. GRNJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCOW achieves a 7.69% return, which is significantly lower than GRNJ's 21.37% return.
MCOW
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- YTD
- 7.69%
- 6M
- 5.42%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GRNJ
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -0.99%
- YTD
- 21.37%
- 6M
- 16.78%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MCOW vs. GRNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MCOW Pacer S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF | 7.69% | 1.99% |
GRNJ Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF | 21.37% | 6.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between MCOW and GRNJ is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MCOW vs. GRNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (MCOW) and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF (GRNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MCOW vs. GRNJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCOW drawdown since its inception was -15.02%, smaller than the maximum GRNJ drawdown of -17.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCOW and GRNJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCOW | GRNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.02% | -17.32% | +2.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.35% | -4.88% | +3.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.43% | -4.10% | -0.33% |
Volatility
MCOW vs. GRNJ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MCOW | GRNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.96% | 30.68% | -12.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.96% | 30.68% | -12.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.96% | 30.68% | -12.72% |
MCOW vs. GRNJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
MCOW has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than GRNJ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
MCOW vs. GRNJ - Dividend Comparison
MCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, while GRNJ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GRNJ Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MCOW Pacer S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF | 0.21% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MCOW and GRNJ have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MCOW is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MCOW is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRNJ.
MCOW has the higher dividend yield at 0.21%, compared with 0.00% for GRNJ.
They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Fundstrat. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for MCOW and 0.75% for GRNJ.
Find the right allocation for MCOW and GRNJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer