PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCOW vs. GRNJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MCOW vs. GRNJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (MCOW) and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF (GRNJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCOW achieves a 5.86% return, which is significantly lower than GRNJ's 19.84% return.


MCOW

1D
-3.02%
1M
1.11%
YTD
5.86%
6M
4.00%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GRNJ

1D
-5.87%
1M
-1.42%
YTD
19.84%
6M
15.85%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCOW vs. GRNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MCOW and GRNJ is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025

0.72

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MCOW vs. GRNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (MCOW) and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF (GRNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MCOW vs. GRNJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MCOWGRNJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

1.74

-1.59

Drawdowns

MCOW vs. GRNJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCOW drawdown since its inception was -15.02%, smaller than the maximum GRNJ drawdown of -17.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCOW and GRNJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MCOWGRNJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.02%

-17.32%

+2.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.02%

-6.07%

+3.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.58%

-4.11%

-0.47%

Volatility

MCOW vs. GRNJ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MCOWGRNJDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.89%

30.86%

-12.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.89%

30.86%

-12.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.89%

30.86%

-12.97%

MCOW vs. GRNJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCOW has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than GRNJ's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

MCOW vs. GRNJ - Dividend Comparison

MCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, while GRNJ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


MCOW and GRNJ have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MCOW is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MCOW is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRNJ.

MCOW has the higher dividend yield at 0.22%, compared with 0.00% for GRNJ.

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Fundstrat. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for MCOW and 0.75% for GRNJ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCOW and GRNJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer