MCONX vs. FSIRX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MCONX (Praxis Genesis Conservative Portfolio) and FSIRX (Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, MCONX returned 4.33%/yr vs 5.53%/yr for FSIRX. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MCONX charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for FSIRX.

Performance

MCONX vs. FSIRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Praxis Genesis Conservative Portfolio (MCONX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCONX achieves a 3.22% return, which is significantly lower than FSIRX's 6.58% return. Over the past 10 years, MCONX has underperformed FSIRX with an annualized return of 4.33%, while FSIRX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.53% annualized return.

MCONX

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 0.98%
• YTD: 3.22%
• 6M: 3.11%
• 1Y: 9.88%
• 3Y*: 7.76%
• 5Y*: 2.10%
• 10Y*: 4.33%

FSIRX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.68%
• YTD: 6.58%
• 6M: 6.34%
• 1Y: 12.68%
• 3Y*: 9.29%
• 5Y*: 5.94%
• 10Y*: 5.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCONX vs. FSIRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MCONX Praxis Genesis Conservative Portfolio	3.22%	10.15%	5.16%	9.51%	-14.59%	1.66%	10.28%	13.67%	-2.64%	8.36%
FSIRX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I	6.58%	10.38%	5.83%	4.58%	-3.34%	15.89%	3.72%	10.55%	-3.99%	4.10%

Correlation

The correlation between MCONX and FSIRX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2009	0.60

Over the past year, the correlation between MCONX and FSIRX has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

MCONX vs. FSIRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCONX

MCONX Risk / Return Rank: 49
MCONX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
MCONX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
MCONX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
MCONX Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
MCONX Martin Ratio Rank: 48

FSIRX

FSIRX Risk / Return Rank: 86
FSIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FSIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
FSIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
FSIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
FSIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCONX vs. FSIRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Praxis Genesis Conservative Portfolio (MCONX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MCONX	FSIRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.93	2.54	-0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.80	3.50	-0.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.48	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.31	4.62	-2.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.36	18.52	-9.16

MCONX vs. FSIRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCONX Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the FSIRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCONX and FSIRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MCONX vs. FSIRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCONX drawdown since its inception was -21.51%, smaller than the maximum FSIRX drawdown of -33.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCONX and FSIRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MCONX	FSIRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.51%	-33.39%	+11.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.45%	-2.70%	-1.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.12%	-5.81%	-1.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.51%	-12.82%	-8.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.51%	-19.98%	-1.53%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.24%	-2.70%	+2.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.97%	-4.16%	+1.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.10%	0.68%	+0.42%

Volatility

MCONX vs. FSIRX - Volatility Comparison

Praxis Genesis Conservative Portfolio (MCONX) has a higher volatility of 2.11% compared to Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX) at 1.36%. This indicates that MCONX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSIRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MCONX	FSIRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.11%	1.36%	+0.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.40%	3.86%	+0.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.34%	4.92%	+0.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.91%	6.92%	-0.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.22%	6.75%	-0.53%

MCONX vs. FSIRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCONX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than FSIRX's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

MCONX vs. FSIRX - Dividend Comparison

MCONX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, more than FSIRX's 4.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSIRX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I	4.27%	4.72%	4.80%	5.28%	7.33%	5.37%	2.23%	3.09%	9.42%	2.63%	2.37%	1.75%
MCONX Praxis Genesis Conservative Portfolio	4.72%	4.76%	4.90%	1.85%	2.31%	1.66%	3.49%	2.61%	3.84%	3.06%	2.25%	2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MCONX and FSIRX in my portfolio?

MCONX and FSIRX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MCONX or FSIRX?

MCONX has higher volatility (2.11%) compared to FSIRX (1.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCONX dropped -21.51% vs FSIRX's -33.39%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSIRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.