MCNAX vs. BHBFX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

MCNAX (Madison Conservative Allocation Fund) and BHBFX (Madison Dividend Income Fund) are both mutual funds - MCNAX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Madison Funds, while BHBFX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Madison Funds. Over the past 10 years, MCNAX returned 4.25%/yr vs 9.66%/yr for BHBFX. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MCNAX charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for BHBFX.

Performance

MCNAX vs. BHBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Madison Conservative Allocation Fund (MCNAX) and Madison Dividend Income Fund (BHBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCNAX achieves a 4.85% return, which is significantly lower than BHBFX's 6.67% return. Over the past 10 years, MCNAX has underperformed BHBFX with an annualized return of 4.25%, while BHBFX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.66% annualized return.

MCNAX

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 1.90%
• YTD: 4.85%
• 6M: 5.53%
• 1Y: 12.05%
• 3Y*: 7.83%
• 5Y*: 2.48%
• 10Y*: 4.25%

BHBFX

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: -1.11%
• YTD: 6.67%
• 6M: 6.76%
• 1Y: 13.11%
• 3Y*: 9.82%
• 5Y*: 5.03%
• 10Y*: 9.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCNAX vs. BHBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MCNAX Madison Conservative Allocation Fund	4.85%	9.31%	4.55%	7.96%	-13.79%	2.97%	9.16%	12.44%	-2.98%	9.68%
BHBFX Madison Dividend Income Fund	6.67%	8.19%	7.62%	1.76%	-5.50%	22.82%	6.34%	25.17%	-0.81%	19.94%

Correlation

The correlation between MCNAX and BHBFX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2006	0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between MCNAX and BHBFX has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

MCNAX vs. BHBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCNAX

MCNAX Risk / Return Rank: 47
MCNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
MCNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
MCNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 52
MCNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
MCNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 49

BHBFX

BHBFX Risk / Return Rank: 23
BHBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
BHBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
BHBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 19
BHBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
BHBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCNAX vs. BHBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Conservative Allocation Fund (MCNAX) and Madison Dividend Income Fund (BHBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MCNAX	BHBFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.04	1.30	+0.74
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.98	1.96	+1.02
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.23	+0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.38	2.10	+0.28
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.12	5.99	+4.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MCNAX vs. BHBFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCNAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is higher than the BHBFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCNAX and BHBFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MCNAX	BHBFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.04	1.30	+0.74
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33	0.32	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62	0.56	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	0.76	-0.18

Drawdowns

MCNAX vs. BHBFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCNAX drawdown since its inception was -27.65%, smaller than the maximum BHBFX drawdown of -34.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCNAX and BHBFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MCNAX	BHBFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.65%	-34.07%	+6.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.10%	-6.39%	+1.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.06%	-14.32%	+8.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.20%	-23.80%	+1.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.20%	-32.34%	+10.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.55%	+3.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.42%	-3.70%	-0.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.20%	2.24%	-1.04%

Volatility

MCNAX vs. BHBFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Madison Conservative Allocation Fund (MCNAX) is 2.23%, while Madison Dividend Income Fund (BHBFX) has a volatility of 2.78%. This indicates that MCNAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BHBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MCNAX	BHBFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.23%	2.78%	-0.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.95%	7.56%	-2.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.94%	10.11%	-4.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.66%	15.58%	-7.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.85%	17.34%	-10.49%

MCNAX vs. BHBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCNAX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than BHBFX's 0.91% expense ratio.

Dividends

MCNAX vs. BHBFX - Dividend Comparison

MCNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, less than BHBFX's 11.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BHBFX Madison Dividend Income Fund	11.76%	12.41%	14.14%	6.01%	9.39%	11.53%	1.53%	3.95%	12.73%	3.89%	3.76%	6.06%
MCNAX Madison Conservative Allocation Fund	2.57%	2.63%	2.81%	2.40%	1.49%	6.65%	7.32%	3.75%	5.24%	4.24%	3.43%	4.51%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MCNAX and BHBFX in my portfolio?

MCNAX and BHBFX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MCNAX or BHBFX?

BHBFX has higher volatility (2.78%) compared to MCNAX (2.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCNAX dropped -27.65% vs BHBFX's -34.07%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MCNAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.