PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MCNAX vs. LQD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


MCNAXLQD
YTD Return1.60%-2.16%
1Y Return5.96%3.38%
3Y Return (Ann)-1.14%-3.39%
5Y Return (Ann)2.37%0.98%
10Y Return (Ann)3.10%2.21%
Sharpe Ratio0.980.32
Daily Std Dev6.06%8.79%
Max Drawdown-27.76%-24.95%
Current Drawdown-5.75%-13.83%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between MCNAX and LQD is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

MCNAX vs. LQD - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, MCNAX achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly higher than LQD's -2.16% return. Over the past 10 years, MCNAX has outperformed LQD with an annualized return of 3.10%, while LQD has yielded a comparatively lower 2.21% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


80.00%90.00%100.00%110.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
87.69%
108.47%
MCNAX
LQD

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Madison Conservative Allocation Fund

iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF

MCNAX vs. LQD - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCNAX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than LQD's 0.15% expense ratio.


MCNAX
Madison Conservative Allocation Fund
Expense ratio chart for MCNAX: current value at 0.71% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.71%
Expense ratio chart for LQD: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MCNAX vs. LQD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Conservative Allocation Fund (MCNAX) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MCNAX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MCNAX, currently valued at 0.98, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.98
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MCNAX, currently valued at 1.46, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.46
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MCNAX, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.003.501.18
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MCNAX, currently valued at 0.40, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.40
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MCNAX, currently valued at 2.82, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.002.82
LQD
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LQD, currently valued at 0.32, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.32
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LQD, currently valued at 0.53, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.53
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LQD, currently valued at 1.06, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.003.501.06
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LQD, currently valued at 0.13, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.13
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LQD, currently valued at 0.89, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.000.89

MCNAX vs. LQD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCNAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is higher than the LQD Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of MCNAX and LQD.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.50December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.98
0.32
MCNAX
LQD

Dividends

MCNAX vs. LQD - Dividend Comparison

MCNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than LQD's 4.31% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
MCNAX
Madison Conservative Allocation Fund
2.02%2.40%1.49%6.65%7.32%3.75%5.24%4.24%3.43%4.51%6.03%2.86%
LQD
iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.31%3.99%3.30%2.30%2.66%3.29%3.67%3.10%3.34%3.47%3.39%3.83%

Drawdowns

MCNAX vs. LQD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCNAX drawdown since its inception was -27.76%, which is greater than LQD's maximum drawdown of -24.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCNAX and LQD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-18.00%-16.00%-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-5.75%
-13.83%
MCNAX
LQD

Volatility

MCNAX vs. LQD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Madison Conservative Allocation Fund (MCNAX) is 1.49%, while iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) has a volatility of 1.65%. This indicates that MCNAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%1.50%2.00%2.50%3.00%3.50%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1.49%
1.65%
MCNAX
LQD