MCNAX vs. LQD

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

MCNAX (Madison Conservative Allocation Fund) and LQD (iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) are both funds - MCNAX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Madison Funds, while LQD is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the iBoxx $ Liquid Investment Grade Index. Over the past 10 years, MCNAX returned 4.25%/yr vs 2.52%/yr for LQD. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MCNAX charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for LQD.

Performance

MCNAX vs. LQD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Madison Conservative Allocation Fund (MCNAX) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCNAX achieves a 4.85% return, which is significantly higher than LQD's 0.46% return. Over the past 10 years, MCNAX has outperformed LQD with an annualized return of 4.25%, while LQD has yielded a comparatively lower 2.52% annualized return.

MCNAX

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 1.90%
• YTD: 4.85%
• 6M: 5.53%
• 1Y: 12.05%
• 3Y*: 7.83%
• 5Y*: 2.48%
• 10Y*: 4.25%

LQD

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 0.72%
• YTD: 0.46%
• 6M: -0.03%
• 1Y: 6.08%
• 3Y*: 4.95%
• 5Y*: -0.04%
• 10Y*: 2.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCNAX vs. LQD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MCNAX Madison Conservative Allocation Fund	4.85%	9.31%	4.55%	7.96%	-13.79%	2.97%	9.16%	12.44%	-2.98%	9.68%
LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	0.46%	7.90%	0.86%	9.40%	-17.92%	-1.84%	10.97%	17.37%	-3.79%	7.06%

Correlation

The correlation between MCNAX and LQD is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2006	0.41

Over the past year, MCNAX and LQD have become more correlated (0.72) than their long-term average of 0.41, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

MCNAX vs. LQD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCNAX

MCNAX Risk / Return Rank: 47
MCNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
MCNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
MCNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 52
MCNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
MCNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 49

LQD

LQD Risk / Return Rank: 32
LQD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
LQD Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
LQD Omega Ratio Rank: 28
LQD Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
LQD Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCNAX vs. LQD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Conservative Allocation Fund (MCNAX) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MCNAX	LQD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.04	1.14	+0.90
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.98	1.67	+1.31
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.20	+0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.38	1.83	+0.56
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.12	5.23	+4.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MCNAX vs. LQD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCNAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is higher than the LQD Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCNAX and LQD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MCNAX	LQD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.04	1.14	+0.90
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33	-0.01	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62	0.29	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	0.54	+0.05

Drawdowns

MCNAX vs. LQD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCNAX drawdown since its inception was -27.65%, which is greater than LQD's maximum drawdown of -24.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCNAX and LQD.

Drawdown Indicators

	MCNAX	LQD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.65%	-24.95%	-2.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.10%	-3.34%	-1.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.06%	-8.43%	+2.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.20%	-24.95%	+2.75%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.20%	-24.95%	+2.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.72%	+3.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.42%	-3.99%	-0.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.20%	1.17%	+0.03%

Volatility

MCNAX vs. LQD - Volatility Comparison

Madison Conservative Allocation Fund (MCNAX) has a higher volatility of 2.23% compared to iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) at 1.65%. This indicates that MCNAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MCNAX	LQD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.23%	1.65%	+0.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.95%	3.90%	+1.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.94%	5.36%	+0.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.66%	8.65%	-0.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.85%	8.68%	-1.83%

MCNAX vs. LQD - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCNAX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than LQD's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

MCNAX vs. LQD - Dividend Comparison

MCNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, less than LQD's 4.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	4.57%	4.48%	4.45%	3.99%	3.30%	2.30%	2.66%	3.29%	3.67%	3.10%	3.34%	3.47%
MCNAX Madison Conservative Allocation Fund	2.57%	2.63%	2.81%	2.40%	1.49%	6.65%	7.32%	3.75%	5.24%	4.24%	3.43%	4.51%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MCNAX and LQD in my portfolio?

MCNAX and LQD have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MCNAX or LQD?

MCNAX has higher volatility (2.23%) compared to LQD (1.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCNAX dropped -27.65% vs LQD's -24.95%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MCNAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.