PortfoliosLab logo
MCNAX vs. LQD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MCNAX and LQD is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

MCNAX vs. LQD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Madison Conservative Allocation Fund (MCNAX) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MCNAX:

0.70

LQD:

0.60

Sortino Ratio

MCNAX:

1.06

LQD:

0.86

Omega Ratio

MCNAX:

1.14

LQD:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

MCNAX:

0.38

LQD:

0.30

Martin Ratio

MCNAX:

2.92

LQD:

1.59

Ulcer Index

MCNAX:

1.58%

LQD:

2.74%

Daily Std Dev

MCNAX:

6.45%

LQD:

7.49%

Max Drawdown

MCNAX:

-27.76%

LQD:

-24.95%

Current Drawdown

MCNAX:

-7.83%

LQD:

-10.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCNAX achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly lower than LQD's 1.32% return. Over the past 10 years, MCNAX has underperformed LQD with an annualized return of 0.82%, while LQD has yielded a comparatively higher 2.46% annualized return.


MCNAX

YTD

1.24%

1M

3.41%

6M

-0.49%

1Y

4.62%

5Y*

0.09%

10Y*

0.82%

LQD

YTD

1.32%

1M

1.70%

6M

-0.76%

1Y

4.79%

5Y*

0.17%

10Y*

2.46%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MCNAX vs. LQD - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCNAX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than LQD's 0.15% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MCNAX vs. LQD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCNAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MCNAX is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MCNAX is 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MCNAX is 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MCNAX is 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MCNAX is 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MCNAX is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

LQD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LQD is 5656
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LQD is 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LQD is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LQD is 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LQD is 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LQD is 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MCNAX vs. LQD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Conservative Allocation Fund (MCNAX) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MCNAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is comparable to the LQD Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCNAX and LQD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

MCNAX vs. LQD - Dividend Comparison

MCNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, less than LQD's 4.50% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MCNAX
Madison Conservative Allocation Fund
2.76%2.82%2.41%1.48%1.78%2.00%1.77%2.37%1.71%1.97%1.32%1.58%
LQD
iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.50%4.45%3.99%3.30%2.30%2.66%3.29%3.67%3.10%3.34%3.47%3.39%

Drawdowns

MCNAX vs. LQD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCNAX drawdown since its inception was -27.76%, which is greater than LQD's maximum drawdown of -24.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCNAX and LQD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

MCNAX vs. LQD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Madison Conservative Allocation Fund (MCNAX) is 2.38%, while iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) has a volatility of 2.79%. This indicates that MCNAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...