MCMVX vs. VMFVX
Compare and contrast key facts about Monongahela All Cap Value Fund (MCMVX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX).
MCMVX is managed by Moncapfund. It was launched on Jul 1, 2013. VMFVX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on Nov 2, 2010.
Performance
MCMVX vs. VMFVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MCMVX vs. VMFVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCMVX Monongahela All Cap Value Fund | 4.04% | 9.74% | 15.38% | 12.18% | -7.73% | 22.57% | 13.24% | 26.98% | -8.15% | 20.85% |
VMFVX Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares | 1.00% | 7.57% | 10.59% | 16.49% | -7.03% | 30.54% | 3.68% | 26.18% | -11.90% | 12.27% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCMVX achieves a 4.04% return, which is significantly higher than VMFVX's 1.00% return. Over the past 10 years, MCMVX has outperformed VMFVX with an annualized return of 11.92%, while VMFVX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.07% annualized return.
MCMVX
- 1D
- 2.59%
- 1M
- -6.19%
- YTD
- 4.04%
- 6M
- 7.09%
- 1Y
- 20.02%
- 3Y*
- 13.46%
- 5Y*
- 7.83%
- 10Y*
- 11.92%
VMFVX
- 1D
- 2.29%
- 1M
- -5.52%
- YTD
- 1.00%
- 6M
- 2.62%
- 1Y
- 12.45%
- 3Y*
- 10.94%
- 5Y*
- 7.21%
- 10Y*
- 10.07%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MCMVX vs. VMFVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MCMVX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than VMFVX's 0.08% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MCMVX vs. VMFVX — Risk / Return Rank
MCMVX
VMFVX
MCMVX vs. VMFVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monongahela All Cap Value Fund (MCMVX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MCMVX | VMFVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.07 | 0.63 | +0.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.61 | 1.03 | +0.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.14 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 0.91 | +0.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.61 | 3.44 | +3.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MCMVX | VMFVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 0.63 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.37 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.46 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.50 | +0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between MCMVX and VMFVX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MCMVX vs. VMFVX - Dividend Comparison
MCMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.26%, more than VMFVX's 1.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCMVX Monongahela All Cap Value Fund | 6.26% | 6.51% | 5.41% | 3.23% | 4.79% | 7.61% | 1.25% | 3.09% | 6.87% | 10.44% | 2.13% | 1.75% |
VMFVX Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares | 1.86% | 1.88% | 1.81% | 1.58% | 2.04% | 1.81% | 2.48% | 1.94% | 2.01% | 1.56% | 1.42% | 1.73% |
Drawdowns
MCMVX vs. VMFVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCMVX drawdown since its inception was -36.75%, smaller than the maximum VMFVX drawdown of -45.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCMVX and VMFVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCMVX | VMFVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.75% | -45.79% | +9.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.77% | -14.52% | +1.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.06% | -22.46% | +1.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.75% | -45.79% | +9.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.19% | -7.59% | +1.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.12% | -5.52% | +1.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 3.84% | -0.70% |
Volatility
MCMVX vs. VMFVX - Volatility Comparison
Monongahela All Cap Value Fund (MCMVX) has a higher volatility of 5.59% compared to Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX) at 5.31%. This indicates that MCMVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMFVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MCMVX | VMFVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.59% | 5.31% | +0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.31% | 11.35% | -1.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.26% | 20.59% | -1.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.64% | 19.55% | -2.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.00% | 21.88% | -3.88% |